Super fact 47 : In 1991, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine became the third largest nuclear power in the world after Russia and the United States. Ukraine held about one third of the former Soviet nuclear weapons and delivery systems. Ukraine agreed to transfer these weapons to Russia for dismantlement in exchange for economic compensation and assurances to respect Ukrainian independence and borders.
After the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine inherited an estimated 1,700 to 1,900 strategic nuclear warheads, 130 UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) with six warheads each, 46 RT-23 Molodets ICBMs with ten warheads apiece, and an estimated 2,650-4,200 tactical nuclear weapons. It should be noted that these nuclear warheads were not under Ukrainian control.
In 1994, Ukraine agreed to transfer these weapons to Russia for dismantlement in exchange for economic compensation and assurances from Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom to respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty within its existing borders. These political agreements are referred to as the Budapest Memorandum.
These events are relevant to what is happening in Ukraine today, and yet it is seldom discussed, and many people are unaware of or have forgotten about this history. It also comes as a surprise to many that there are nuclear states who have relinquished their nuclear weapons. This is why I call this fact a super fact.

Nine Nuclear States
There are nine nuclear states in the world as of 2025 according to the Federation of Atomic Scientists. There are 12,331 nuclear warheads including 9,600 in active military stockpiles.
- Russia – 5,449 warheads
- The United States – 5,277 warheads
- China – 600 warheads
- France – 290 warheads
- United Kingdom – 225 warheads
- India – 180 warheads
- Pakistan – 170 warheads
- Israel – 90 warheads
- North Korea – 50 warheads
There are also countries that are hosting nuclear warheads owned by other countries.
- Italy (the United States) – 35 warheads
- Turkey (the United States) – 20 warheads
- Belgium (the United States) – 15 warheads
- Germany (the United States) – 15 warheads
- Netherlands (the United States) – 15 warheads
- Belarus (Russia) – ? warheads

Four nations that relinquished their nuclear weapons programs
The four nations that relinquished their nuclear weapons programs are Belarus, Kazakhstan, South Africa, and Ukraine. Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine returned their inherited nuclear weapons to Russia after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. However, it should be noted that in 2023 Russia began deploying tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus. However, Belarus does not currently possess its own nuclear weapons. South Africa voluntarily dismantled its nuclear weapons program in 1991.

How to Build a Nuclear Bomb
This section is just some extra reading that is only somewhat related to the topic. However, since it is an interesting topic somewhat related to the topic I might as well explain how to build a nuclear bomb. Don’t worry I will not present any engineering details, only general principals, which is all I know, and which are already all over internet. Besides if I were to give detailed engineering instructions some peacenik hippie might have a hissing fit and swear in the comment section (that was a joke).
Anyway, the main idea behind a nuclear fission bomb is to achieve a runaway chain reaction. A fusion bomb, or a so-called hydrogen bomb is different. To create a fission bomb you are not looking for the most radioactive materials there are. You are looking for a fuel which you can use to create a runaway chain reaction, and which is also stable enough to make a bomb possible, in other words not too radioactive. Basically, the fuel must be just right. The primary fuels used in fission bombs are uranium-235 and plutonium-239. These isotopes undergo fission when struck by neutrons, releasing a massive amount of energy in a chain reaction.

I should explain, isotopes are different forms of an element. For example, hydrogen comes in three different forms, a nucleus with just a proton, a nucleus with one proton and one neutron (deuterium), and a nucleus with one proton and two neutrons (tritium). Isotopes for the same element are chemically identical but have different atomic weight and they may or may not be radioactive.
The three isotopes of Uranium are uranium-234, uranium-235, and uranium-238. The one we need is uranium-235, which has 92 protons and 143 neutrons in the nucleus. The isotopes of Plutonium include Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240, Pu-241, and Pu-242 but there are others. The one we need is plutonium-239, which has 94 protons and 145 neutrons in the nucleus. There are more than 3,500 known isotopes of which 3,000 are radioactive.
During Uranium-235 fission, an average of 2.5 neutrons are released. Specifically, the fission of U-235 typically releases 2 or 3 neutrons, with the average being close to 2.5. During the fission of plutonium-239, an average of 2.9 neutrons are released (depending on the energy of the incident neutron). The important thing for bomb making is that one atom/nucleus releases enough neutrons so that the neutrons from one nucleus cause more than one fission. For example, a nucleus releases three neutrons and two of those neutrons cause two more fission events, which in turn cause four fission events, etc. 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, a trillion…

By putting together enough U-235 you can make it so that one fission event will result in more than one additional fission event. This is called the critical mass. The critical mass for U-235 is 47 kilograms (104 pounds). Theoretically, you can achieve this by taking a 24-kilogram half sphere of U-235 in your right hand and a 24-kilogram half sphere of U-235 in your left hand and bring them together. You will achieve a limited chain reaction for a nano second, but you will just blow the two halves apart and kill yourself, but your city will survive. This is called a fizzle. To make most of the 48-kilogram mass undergo fission you have to force them together long enough for the chain reaction to complete (or almost complete). This requires force and precise calculations. See the illustration below.

Another difficulty is obtaining nearly 100% U-235 from natural uranium. 99% of the Uranium you find in nature is U-238. U-235 and U-238 chemically identical so extracting U-235 from natural uranium is difficult. However, U-235 is slightly lighter than U-238 so you can use centrifugal separation as you do to separate cream from milk. What is typically done is using a uranium compound, uranium hexafluoride, heat it into gaseous form and then utilize centrifugal separation to extract the uranium hexafluoride with U-235 isotopes. After that you can chemically extract the uranium, which is now U-235.
Thank you very much for this Superfacts post. I did remember the Budapest Memorandum but couldn’t remember the details very well any more. I lived in Europe at that time and the substance of that agreement was then well-known there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Lynette. I do remember it too but since I haven’t heard much about it since then I mostly forgot about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Thomas for a well put together post I knew a smattering of it but I now know more…Its a tad scary that Russian and the US lead the pack by a long way…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for your kind words Carol
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure Thomas x
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very informative. I feel ashamed that the Budapest Memorandum wasn’t worth the paper it was written on. So much information here!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes you are right. It was reinterated in 2009 and therefore still valid but not really respected.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel that a lot of people don’t know this information, or the rest of the relationship between the two countries and yet have an opinion about the current war. Great information to help those people understand. Maggie
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Maggie. I try to find important facts that are true and yet misunderstood, unknown, surprising or disputed by those who don’t know. There are so many such, what I call super facts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
An informative and fact-filled post, as all of your Super Facts are!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for your kind words Alex.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is way too many countries with nuclear power. I hadn’t counted all of them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes there are certain nations that you don’t want to have nuclear weapons. I was surprised to see North Korea on the list. I remember the test they did that fizzled and how we were supposed to stop them, and now they have 50 warheads according to the Federation of Atomic Scientists and ICAN. That doesn’t make me sleep better at night and is a probably a super fact since it would surprise a lot of people (including me). Then we have Iran, which we know is enriching far beyond the 2-3% U-235 you need for a nuclear power station (you need at least 82% for a uranium bomb).
LikeLiked by 1 person
For an interesting fictional treatment of what can happen in this current state, check out Jamie Lee Grey’s 9-book series, Mystery Babylon. The books offer a glimpse of the before and after of nuclear war from four unique points of view shaped by the major powers. Intriguing. Scary. Urgent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Grant. I looked up the series. Mystery Babylon looks like a very intriguing series.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for this informative post, Thomas. What a shame the Budapest Memorandum didn’t hold up. It’s startling to see how many nuclear weapons Russia and the U.S. both have! 😬
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I agree. Thank you so much for your kind comment Debbie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s scary that there are so many nuclear weapons in the world. In the publishing world, when we negotiate contracts, we always have to be mindful that businesses can be sold and even if we trust those we’re negotiating with now, our contract might end up in the hands of someone very different in the future. By the same token, governments change, sometimes through force and sometimes through a constitutional process. One hopes the stewards of these awesome destructive forces really, truly understands their responsibility to the human race as a whole.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope so too. Like you say governments change, sometimes for the worse, and the mere existence of these weapons is quite scary. Hopefully, all the governments of nuclear states will remain reasonably sane, like North Korea. Sorry bad joke. Anyway, I agree with you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, sadly they’re the obvious example of a worrisome state to control this power. And they’re not really the only one… but I’ll leave it there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I was surprised to read that they have 50 nukes. It does not help me sleep better at night.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I remember when Ukraine and other countries relinquished their nuclear weapons. Interesting article, Thomas!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Dawn and it is good that you remember.
LikeLike
Lulu: “Our Dada says he remembers this! And he thinks of it when people are like, ‘Why are we defending Ukraine anyway?’ …”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lulu your Dada is very smart
LikeLike