The Infeasibility of Manned Mars Missions

Superfact 141: Humans travelling to Mars and back using current chemical rocket technology is nearly impossible and extremely dangerous. It is in a completely different category from manned Moon Missions.

This photo was taken by NASA’s Viking 1 probe in 1976. The photo shows a slightly reddish planet with an enormous canyon, Valles Marineris. | The Infeasibility of Manned Mars Missions
Photo taken by NASA’s Viking 1 probe in 1976. NASA/USGS, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. The image comes from this site.

The exponential nature of rocket physics (the tyranny of the rocket equation), massive fuel and weight requirements, immense distances, the 500 days of waiting on the surface for Earth and Mars to align for a safe return, and severe hazards to human health, makes travelling to Mars immensely more difficult than travelling to the moon and back.

A realistic photograph of an astronaut standing on the surface of Mars, wearing a white space suit with reflective visor. The astronaut is holding a shiny silver sphere in one hand, which reflects the reddish Martian landscape. In the background, a Martian rover with visible details of its wheels and instruments rests on the rocky, dusty terrain. The red-orange soil and rugged landscape stretch into the distance under a pale, hazy sky. Hyper-realistic, sharp details, cinematic composition, vibrant colors, and immersive atmosphere.
Shutterstock asset id: 2680563665 by Shutterstock AI Generator.

We went to the moon. Russian cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov spent 438 days in space. We’ve sent spacecraft and landers, rovers and an aerial helicopter to Mars, so why could we not send people? It is just a few hundred times farther than the moon. Shouldn’t we be able to keep an astronaut alive for a couple of years for a Mars trip? It turns out that those questions are forgetting about several enormous obstacles. It turns out that the enormous obstacles facing a human Mars expedition are surprising if you haven’t investigated this topic before, and therefore I consider it a super fact.

The Tyranny of the Rocket Equation

The Earth and the Sun have gravitational fields that a rocket needs to overcome to move up into space. A good indicator of how difficult it is to leave a planet, or other celestial objects, is its escape velocity. The escape velocity is the minimum speed a rocket must achieve to break free from a celestial body’s gravitational pull and never fall back, without any further propulsion. The escape velocity for Earth is 11.2 km/s, for the sun it is 617.7 km/s, and for the sun starting from Earth’s orbit it is around 42.1 km/s. This means you need a better rocket to make it all the way to Mars because it is further away from the sun.

If the rocket is not powerful enough you need to add more fuel. The problem is that more fuel means that you make the rocket heavier, so you need even more fuel, etc. This is called the rocket equation. It is commonly called the tyranny of the rocket equation. Current chemical rockets using the best hydrogen-oxygen propellants already dedicate about 80% to 90% of their mass purely to carrying fuel.

Smoke and fire surrounding the Saturn V launch. | The Infeasibility of Manned Mars Missions
The photograph of the Saturn V launch vehicle (SA-506) for the Apollo 11 mission liftoff from launch complex 39A at the Kennedy Space Center. USA – July 16, 1969. Shutterstock asset id: 2599523569 by Rawpixel.com.

In fact, leaving Earth with a standard chemical rocket would become practically impossible if the planet’s radius were 50% larger. If Earth’s radius increased by 50% while maintaining the same density, its mass would grow by a factor of 3.375, raising surface gravity to about 1.5 times current levels. No matter how much fuel you added you could never leave planet Earth.

The picture shows a smaller Earth on the left and a bigger Earth on the right. Above the smaller Earth you see a small red rocket lifting up. Above the bigger Earth you see a small red rocket falling back down.
This picture illustrates the problem. You cannot get off the 50% larger Earth on the right with a standard rocket, no matter how much fuel you added. I generated this picture with the help of ChatGPT.

I should say that situation with Mars is a bit different from the supersized Earth situation above. We can send a standard chemical rocket spacecraft to Mars. Otherwise, we would not have been able to get any spacecraft to Mars. However, for a round trip we need extra fuel to get back up from Mars and that cannot be done without refueling. This means that you need orbital refueling strategies. For example, you can build refueling stations along the way, on the moon and on Mars, and then you have to transport the fuel there, before you begin the roundtrip. That is a lot of extra effort. You can read more here.

The Required 500 Days of Waiting on Mars

The distance to Mars is immense. When Mars is the closest to Earth it is on average roughly 60 million miles, which is 250 times farther than the moon. This is referred to as Mars being in opposition. When Mars is the farthest from Earth, it is 250 million miles from Earth, or 1,050 times as far as the moon. This is because Earth and Mars travel in orbits at different speeds. That’s a long trip. The picture below shows the planets and their orbits. See how Earth and Mars are far away from each other in this picture.

Detailed vector illustration of the solar system showing planets orbiting the sun with labeled names and elliptical orbital paths in a clean, educational style.Solar System Planets Orbiting Sun with Labels and Elliptical Paths Illustration. | The Infeasibility of Manned Mars Missions
Solar system. Shutterstock asset id: 2785416813 by Yeakub Dhali.

There are two obvious problems. First, after you land on Mars you cannot go back the way you came. You are going to have to wait for the best opportunity to fly back to Earth. A round-trip mission to Mars is estimated to take 900 to 1100 days. One estimate is 911 days (about 2.5 years): 174 days to get there, over 500 days waiting on the surface for planets to align for a safe return, and 201 days to fly back. The crew needs to be protected from the extreme radiation for 500 days, and fed for 500 days, and kept safe for 500 days without access to any Earth facilities.

Add to that the fact that Mars and Earth will be on the opposite side of the Sun from each other for two to several weeks (Mars solar conjunction) during which radio communication will be impossible. Any help needed from Earth during that time will be absent.

The Extreme Radiation and other Hazards

Last but not least the threats to the astronauts health are immense. Space radiation during a short trip to the moon is one thing. Being subject to space radiation during two and half years is quite another. Mars magnetic field is weak and its atmosphere thin, so you won’t get much help from that. To protect astronauts, you would need lead and water containment, which would add weight and additional fuel requirements. A very long time without gravity, maintaining safe ecosystems inside a rocket for two and half years, isolation and confinement, are all challenges that may not be survivable.

Conclusion

A manned Mars Mission is easier said than done. If you are interested, below is a YouTube Video that explains the details. Naturally, in the future we may have different kinds of technology, nuclear powered spacecraft, spacecraft utilizing the solar wind, advanced robots aiding astronauts, etc., that could make manned Mars missions feasible.




To see the other Super Facts click here

Pulsars the Cosmic Lighthouses

Super fact 108 : A Pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits beams of electromagnetic radiation from its magnetic poles. The radioactive beam from a pulsar that is located where the sun is located would heat earth’s surface to tens of thousands of degrees. The pulsar may rotate hundreds of times per second, and we only detect the beam when it crosses our line of sight. A neutron star, or a pulsar, is vastly denser than the Sun, typically hundreds of trillions of times denser.

Illustration of the "lighthouse" effect produced by a pulsar| Pulsars the Cosmic Lighthouses
Illustration of the “lighthouse” effect produced by a pulsar. Michael Kramer, CC BY-SA 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/, via Wikimedia Commons.

As mentioned, a pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits beams of radiation from its magnetic poles. A neutron star is an ultra-dense remnant left behind when a massive supergiant star runs out of fuel and collapses. You can read more about neutron stars in my post here and you can read about neutron stars that act like super magnets called magnetars here. This web page feature a calculation of what the intensity of a pulsar beam would be if it hit Earth and the pulsar is located where the sun is.

A blue pulsars / neutron star directs a beam toward earth and burns the surface.
The beam from a pulsar hits earth causing destruction. This is an AI picture generated by me and ChatGPT.

I consider this a super fact because pulsars are a very extreme type of star, which existence I believe comes as a surprise to many people.

Blue neutron star on black background with two bright blue beams. Compact supermassive object. | Pulsars the Cosmic Lighthouses
Pulsar with energetic jets in space. Shutterstock asset id: 2697475389 by Nazarii_Neshcherenskyi

Below is a one and a half minute NASA video explaining what a pulsar is. It is taken from this website.




Different Types of Neutron Stars and Different types of Pulsars

At top there is some text stating “A neutron star is a dense core left behind after a massive star goes supernova and explodes. Though only about 10 to 20 miles (15 to 30 kilometers) wide, they can have three times the mass of our Sun, making them some of the densest objects in the universe, second only to black holes. A teaspoon of neutron star material would weigh 4 billion tons on Earth. There are several types of neutron stars.” :  Below the text at the top there is a picture of a magnetar, a pulsar and a magnetar plus pulsar. The text for each picture says: Magnetar - A magnetar is a neutron star with a particularly strong magnetic field, about 1,000 times stronger than a normal neutron star. That's about a trillion times stronger than a normal neutron star. That's about a trillion times stronger than Earth's magnetic field and about 100 million times stronger than the most powerful magnets ever made by humans. Scientists have only discovered about 30 magnetars so far. Pulsar - Most of the roughly 3,000 known neutron stars are pulsars, which emit twin beams of radiation from their magnetic poles. Those poles may not be precisely aligned with the neutron star's rotation axis, so as the neutron star spins, the beams sweep across the sky, like beams from a lighthouse. To observers on Earth, this can make it look as though the pulsar's light is pulsing on and off. Magnetar + Pulsar – there are about six known neutron stars that are both pulsars and magnetars.
Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech, Attribution, via Wikimedia Commons

Neutron stars are extreme stars. They are small super dense stars with extreme gravitational fields. They are in a sense like a gigantic atomic nucleus. Perhaps it is not surprising that they are extreme in other ways as well. There are pulsars, neutron stars which emit twin beams of radiation from their magnetic poles. Those poles may not be precisely aligned with the neutron star’s rotation axis, so as the neutron star spins, the beams sweep across the sky, like beams from a lighthouse. To observers on Earth, this can make it look as though the pulsar’s light is pulsing on and off.

There are different types of pulsars. Some spin extremely fast. They rotate hundreds of times per second, even 700 times per second. They are called Millisecond Pulsars. There are pulsars that emit beams of radio waves and pulsars that emit only gamma rays. A black widow pulsar a star system consisting of a rapidly spinning pulsar and a companion star that is being consumed by the pulsar like a black widow spider eats its mate. This link feature animation videos from NASA showing a star being consumed by a black widow pulsar.

Finally, there are magnetars, neutron stars with extremely powerful magnetic fields trillions and quadrillion times stronger than Earth’s magnetic field at the surface. You can read about them here.

Other extreme Celestial objects




To see the other Super Facts click here

My Post We Can See What Stars Are Made of Selected for Freshly Pressed

WordPress Freshly Pressed
Your site has been selected for Freshly Pressed!
Congrats, we love your writing and want to share it with the world.

Hi thomasstigwikman,

We’ve selected your post (We Can See What Stars Are Made of) for Freshly Pressed, a showcase where we feature editors’ picks and community favorites on WordPress.com.

We are thrilled to share your post with our wider audience.

Your post will appear at wordpress.com/discover/, where members of the WordPress.com community can read, comment, like your post, and subscribe to your site to get notified whenever you publish new content.

Thank you for being part of the biggest and best community of bloggers around the world. We’re proud to be the platform that makes your voice heard.

Cheers,

The WordPress.com Team

The Sun is White but the Sky steals its Blue

Superfact 105: The Sun is white, but the Sky steals its Blue is a poetic way of saying that the sun’s light is scattered by the atmosphere giving the Sun a yellowish tint as well as giving us our blue sky. From space the sun looks completely white.

A bright white sun is setting over Earth. | The Sun is White but the Sky steals its Blue
Sunset from the International Space Station by NASA

Viewed from space the sun is entirely white. White light consists of a mix of all the colors of the rainbow. However, viewed from earth the sun has a yellow tint, which gets more pronounced, it even dips into orange, as the sun nears sunset. That does not happen in space as can be seen below in the one minute sunset timelapse video taken from the International Space Station.

Sunset Timelapse from the International Space Station

On earth the sunset looks more like something in the picture below.

The sun is setting over distant mountains. There are some clouds, a forest, and field in the foreground. The sun has a yellow tint; the clouds are slightly yellow-orange and sky above is blue. | The Sun is White but the Sky steals its Blue
The sky dusk has a dramatic background featuring a summer season golden sunset landscape. The light is at the horizon is an orange and yellow color with blue sky above. Shutterstock asset id: 2670235703 by Nature Peaceful

The sun is a so called yellow dwarf star, or a G-type main-sequence star. The term yellow dwarf is a bit of a misnomer, because they range in color from white, for more luminous G-types like the Sun, to only very slightly yellowish for less massive and less luminous G-type main-sequence stars. The sun emits all the colors of the rainbow simultaneously, but the most dominant color is green. However, this looks white to us.

When sunlight enters Earth’s atmosphere, tiny air molecules scatter shorter, blue wavelengths of light in all directions. This scattering is what makes the sky look blue. This is called Rayleigh scattering. Because much of the blue light is removed, the remaining wavelengths of light that reach your eyes combine to make the sun appear yellow. This is a super fact because it is a basic but surprising fact, and we know it is true.

Rayleigh Scattering

The blue color of the sky is caused by Rayleigh scattering of sunlight by the gases in the Earth’s atmosphere. The image below shows the degree to which Rayleigh scattering occurs at different wavelengths / frequencies of light. Blue has the shortest wavelength (highest frequency) for visible light and red the longest (lowest frequency). The curve shows that blue light scatters more than red light. It should be noted that UV light (not shown) scatter even more. The scattering curve shown is calculated for sunlight passing vertically through the atmosphere.

The graph shows the amount of scattering going from shorter wavelengths (higher frequences) on the left, to longer wavelengths (lower frequences) on the right. Blue has shorter wavelengths and red has longer wavelengths. The graph shows that blue scatter the most.
Figure showing the greater proportion of blue light scattered by the atmosphere relative to red light. Robert A. Rohde derivative work:KES47 (talk) (converted to SVG)., CC BY-SA 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/, via Wikimedia Commons.



To see the Other Super Facts click here

The Moon has a Far Side but not a Dark Side

Super fact 103: The moon is always turning the same side towards us. This side is often referred to as the near side of the moon. The back side, which we can’t see from Earth, is often referred to as the far side of the moon. However, there is no side of the moon that is always dark. The near side of the moon and the far side of the moon both have day and night (in a 29.5 day cycle). Another interesting fact is that even though the near side and the far side of the moon get the same amount of light they are very different.

On the left is the near side of the moon and on the right the far side of the moon. | The Moon has a Far Side but not a Dark Side
The near side of the Moon on the left and the far side of the Moon on the right. They are both full about once a month but at different times. They look quite different and are quite different. Elements of this image were furnished by NASA. Stock Photo ID: 2157518223 by Claudio Caridi.

Below is a youTube video showing an animation composed of actual satellite photos by NASA. It shows the far side of the moon, illuminated by the sun, as it crosses between the DSCOVR spacecraft’s Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) and telescope, and the Earth – one million miles away.

The video has frequently been shown on social media, and I’ve seen many comments stating that it is fake because the back side / far side of the moon is not dark in the video. However, the sun is behind us in the video and shining on both Earth and the far side of the moon. The far side is not always dark.

This is a super fact because many people mistakenly think there is a permanently dark side of the moon, which we know is incorrect and understanding the basics about the moon, the most prominent celestial object in the sky, aside from the sun, is kind of important.

Moon Photos

A close up photo of the near side of the moon.
This is a close up photo of the near side of the moon. It is a full moon. Free picture from Pexels by Jay Brand.
A close up photo of the near side of the moon, but it is a crescent.
This is also a close up photo of the near side of the moon, but it is a crescent moon, which means that the far side, or the back side, is the side that is mostly lit up. In other words, the far side of the moon has day. Free picture from Pexels by Sevde.

I took the photo below with my phone a few minutes ago this evening. The little dot on the left (it is not twinkling) is the planet Venus. The moon is currently a crescent, which means that at the moment of my writing this the back side / far side of the moon has day. The sun is shining down on the far side, and it is reflecting light back into space. The back side / far side is almost a full moon right now, but we can’t see that from Earth.

It is a dark photo with a bright dot on the left and the moon crescent on the right. | The Moon has a Far Side but not a Dark Side
The dot on the left is Venus. On the right is the crescent moon. This photo is taken with my phone a few minutes ago (as of this posting).
Venus and the crescent moon are in the lower right corner and Jupiter in the upper left corner.
This is a zoomed out photo taken at the same time as the photo above. I zoomed out to capture a second dot up in the left corner. That’s another planet, the planet Jupiter (also not twinkling).

Interesting Moon Facts

I thought I might as well mention a few interesting facts about the moon.

On the left is the near side of the moon, and you can see the flat-lying basins called maria. On the right is the far side of the moon, and it does not have the maria. | The Moon has a Far Side but not a Dark Side
The Moon’s nearside and farside Image: NASA LRO / Jatan Mehta

The far side of the moon is different. As you can see in the YouTube video and photo above, the far side looks different from the nearside and it is different in appearance and terrain. The near side of the moon has large, dark, flat-lying basins called maria. They look like oceans. The far side is a lot more rugged and covered by lots of craters. Another difference is that the far side of the moon has a much thicker crust compared to the near side.

The sun is 400 times wider than the moon. They appear to be roughly be the same size in the sky because the moon is 400 times closer.

The moon is drifting away from earth at about 3.8 centimeters per year. The moon is moving away from earth due to the gravitational forces between the moon and earth, which also causes tidal bulges in the Earth’s oceans and the moon. Back in high school I took a difficult physics test for a competition and one of the questions was to show that the moon was moving away from earth due to gravitational forces and calculate by how much. I did not solve that one.

The moon was likely created by a celestial collision. The most widely accepted explanation for the existence of the moon is that the Moon was created when a planet-like object, the size of Mars slammed into Earth, soon after the solar system began forming. That was about 4.5 billion years ago.

NASA found water on the moon. In 2020, NASA announced the discovery of water on the surface of the Moon. The NASA video below features more interesting facts about the moon.

If you visit this link you’ll find an interactive 3D animation using the NASA Visualization Technology Applications and Development (VTAD) technology. By using your mouse, you can view the moon from many different angles and positions (both the near side and the far side of course).




To see the other Super Facts click here