Satellites handle a very small amount of global internet traffic

Super fact 54 : Satellites currently handle a very small percentage of global internet traffic, estimated at about 1%. The vast majority of internet traffic is carried by undersea cables.

I consider this a super fact because it is surprising, true and not trivia. It is an important fact since most of us use internet every day. It is a very common belief that satellites handle most of the global internet traffic, or at least a very large portion of it. I should say that a few years ago I thought so myself.

Space satellite orbiting the Earth. 3D rendering | Satellites handle a very small amount of global internet traffic
Stock Illustration ID: 1372134458 by Boris Rabtsevich
Multiple layers inside a black cable. Optical fibers emerge from the cut end, and they shine.
Submarine underwater communication fiber optic cable on deep seabed. Asset id: 2175977719 by Dragon Claws

How Much Internet Traffic is Handled by Satellites

I should say that I did not find a lot of sites that answered this question, but all of the sites that I found gave similar answers such as, less than 1%, 1.5%, 1-2%, very little, etc.

I started out by asking ChatGPT this question “How much of internet communication does Satellites handle?” The answer I got was that Satellites handle a relatively small percentage of global internet traffic — typically less than 1–2% — with most of the world’s internet communication carried through undersea fiber optic cables and terrestrial infrastructure (like cell towers and wired broadband). Wikipedia states that satellites handle less than 5% – to an estimate of even 0.5%. I should add I do not rely on ChatGPT, SGE or Gemini, or Wikipedia for this blog but I take hints from them.

According to NOAA, over 95 percent of international data and voice transfers are currently routed through the many fiber optic cables that crisscross the world’s seafloors, whilst satellites currently carry just about 1% of global internet traffic according to Research Outreach. Operations Forces Report, Space Voyage Ventures, Neterra, and Newsweek made similar claims .

The reason satellite internet is used less is because satellite internet is significantly more expensive to use than traditional wired connections. In addition, satellites have higher latency (delay) compared to fiber optic cables, and less bandwidth (data capacity). Satellite internet is primarily used in remote areas where other forms of internet access are unavailable. Satellite internet is also used for military and government operations, as well as maritime and aviation connectivity. However, satellite internet is improving so this may change in the future. This is a comparison between satellite internet and optical fiber.

Satellites handle a very small amount of global internet traffic
Photo by SpaceX on Pexels.com
Eight layers in various colors are shown. See below for indicators.
This is a cross section of submarine fiber optic cable. Picture by Oona Räisänen (User:Mysid), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

The layers in the picture of the submarine communications cable above are (from outside to inside): (1) Polyethylene (2) Mylar tape (3) Stranded steel wires (4) Aluminum water barrier (5) Polycarbonate (6) Copper or aluminum tube (7) Petroleum jelly (8) Optical fibers.

Related Post

A related post and super fact is: GPS uses relativity for accuracy



To see the other Super Facts click here

Unknown's avatar

Author: thomasstigwikman

My name is Thomas Wikman. I am a software/robotics engineer with a background in physics. I am currently retired. I took early retirement. I am a dog lover, and especially a Leonberger lover, a home brewer, craft beer enthusiast, I’m learning French, and I am an avid reader. I live in Dallas, Texas, but I am originally from Sweden. I am married to Claudia, and we have three children. I have two blogs. The first feature the crazy adventures of our Leonberger Le Bronco von der Löwenhöhle as well as information on Leonbergers. The second blog, superfactful, feature information and facts I think are very interesting. With this blog I would like to create a list of facts that are accepted as true among the experts of the field and yet disputed amongst the public or highly surprising. These facts are special and in lieu of a better word I call them super-facts.

24 thoughts on “Satellites handle a very small amount of global internet traffic”

    1. Yes me neither. I read about this a couple of years ago but before that I thought satellites took care of most internet traffic. However, since it satellites are becoming more numerous, they might be handling most internet traffic in the future.

      Like

        1. Yes you are right. I read somewhere that we would 20,000 to 40,000 satellites to replace the cables and that would change our night skies. Someone also pointed out to me (Java Bean, a dog) that aliens could use satellites against us like in Independence Day. That’s a lot more difficult with the hundreds of 1.4 million kilometers of deep ocean cables.

          Like

            1. Yes having those shiny dots moving around in the sky would make it difficult to identify stars and planets. I guess we humans aren’t going to impress aliens. I remember the movie when the earth stood still.

              Like

  1. Hi Thomas, your post is very enlightening. I’ve assumed, wrongly, that the reverse was true. Thank you for setting the facts straight for me. 🌞

    Liked by 1 person

  2. An excellent overview of both technologies, Thomas. The history of undersea cables is fascinating, too. I’m drawn to current stories highlighting the risks to those cables. I’m especially concerned about nation-sponsored destruction that can disrupt a country’s sovereignty, making the commerce vulnerable to external forces.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much Grant. I agree that is interesting. Also the nation sponsored destruction is indeed a concern. Satellites are becoming more common and taking over more traffic. I don’t know if that would provide better protection from sabotage.

      Like

  3. Oh, this is such a great observation, Thomas. One of these ships in charge with repairing the underwater internet fibres docks in the Cape Town harbor. We were lucky to see it once. It is massive, but not as large as one might imagine. A few years later there was a massive internet failure off the west coast of Africa and it was this ship that went to get the cables fixed on the ocean bed. I couldn’t even log into my Amazon account, so it was a palpable issue. Then to think that we’ve seen it.

    Thomas, thank you so much for nominating my blog. I so appreciate it. It’s hard work creating and maintaining a blog, as you know, with two, so it means a lot.

    Have a great week!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much Patricia. That is a very interesting story. Maybe these problems you describe will be less common and satellites begin to take over more internet traffic. I don’t know. About the recommendation. Someone recommeded my blog yesterday so I recommended back and added three more people including you. It is the first time I see this feature. Have a great week you too.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I didn’t expect it to be so small a percentage either, Thomas. I live remotely and had satellite internet for years. It was expensive and would frequently cut out on us (if raining or snowing). We had restricted hours and restrictions on usage. (We’d watch movies at midnight when it was cheaper). When Obama funded rural fiber optics, we were able to leave all that behind. Phew!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I wasn’t surprised to read this, but didn’t realize the percentage of satellite internet was so low. We have fibre optic here and it’s a huge improvement over the old cable system. The shipboard internet during our last cruise was via satellite and it was extremely unreliable, and, as you said, expensive!

    P.S. Thank you so much for recommending my blog on the WordPress Reader! 🌹 I hadn’t been aware of this function before, but I have started a list now, and added both of yours to it. 👌

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes it seems very low, but that is what everyone seems to be saying (who says something about it). About the recommendation. Someone recommeded my blog yesterday so I recommended back and added three more people including you. It is the first time I see this feature.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Gwen M. Plano Cancel reply