The goal of this blog is to create a long list of facts that are important, not trivia, and that are known to be true yet are either disputed by large segments of the public or highly surprising or misunderstood by many.
Super fact 51 : In 1968 5,033 Americans died from a drug overdose. In 1978 5,506 Americans died from a drug overdose. In 1999 16,801 Americans died from a drug overdose. In 2022 107,941 Americans died from a drug overdose. 82,000 of those deaths involved opioids (about 76%). The number of people who died from an opioid overdose in 2022 was 10 times the number in 1999. More than half of all opioid deaths in the world were Americans despite being only 4.2% of the world population. The hardest hit demographic is white males.
Note the data in the super fact above is taken from Wikipedia, which in turn took it from CDC. However, the data across multiple sources look roughly the same (CDC / CDC, NIDA/NIH, Our world in Data, Wikipedia). I think this is a super fact. I should add that the statistics seem to have improved a little bit in 2023 and 2024.
I’ve posted about good super facts in this blog several times:
However, unfortunately there are also bad super facts, like this one.
The Severe Drug Overdose Epidemic in the US is a Super Fact
We recently went to the funeral for the young son (in his 20’s) of good friends of ours. He died from a drug overdose. The same thing happened to another friend of ours not too long ago. Despite all the talk about drugs, the war of drugs, and the “just say no campaign”, in the 1980’s I don’t remember this happening to people I knew when I was young, so I looked up the statistics. I knew we had an opioid epidemic with Fentanyl being the greatest culprit followed by Heroin. I just didn’t realize how severe it was and how American it was. This is important and shocking and the sources behind the data are reliable, which is why I consider this a super fact.
The United States Has by Far the Highest Death Rate from Opioids
If you play around with this graph from Our World in Data you will notice that the United States has a very high rate of deaths from drug overdoses, especially opioids, much higher than any other country. For example, take my home country Sweden, where 283 people died from opioid in 2021 (398 all drugs, data from IHME). Compare that with the United States, where 55,452 died from opioid in 2021 (70,893 all drugs, data from IHME). Adjust that for the population in each country you get a rate of 16.3 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants for the US and 2.7 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants for the Sweden. Sweden and the US are both open wealthy democracies in which certain opioids are legal for medical purposes but otherwise illegal. The graph below has slightly different numbers but notice that the year (2024) is different.
Data source : Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Global Burden of Disease (2024). The graph is taken from Our World in Data .
Some illustrative Graphics on Drug Deaths
The graphs below illustrate both the sharp rise in drug related deaths, especially opioids, as well as how hard hit the United States is compared to the rest of the world.
The population of the United States is 340 million.The population of South America is 438 millionThe population of Europe is 744 million.The population of Asia is 4,800 million.This graph shows the contribution to US deaths from specific drugs including synthetic opioids (Fentanyl), Heroin, prescription opioids, and cocaine. Notice that the vertical axis shows the death rate per 100,000 people and not the total number of deaths. Data source : US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER. Note: Opioids include prescription pain relief drugs, synthetic opioids, excluding methadone and other opioids such as heroin. The graph is taken from Our World in Data.
This is my 100th post on my Superfactful blog. There are 50 super-fact posts. The other posts are posts about the blog, like this one, or posts featuring interesting information that I think is important, or book reviews of non-fiction books, travel posts with some information, posts about me, or mysteries.
However, the goal of this blog is to create a long list of facts that are important, not trivia, and that are known to be true and yet are either disputed by large segments of the public or highly surprising or misunderstood by many, perhaps shocking. Learning or accepting such a fact will change how you view the world. This makes these facts deserving of special attention, which is why I refer to them as super facts. You can also consider the super facts as a form of myth busting, major myth busting.
As mentioned, at the time of writing this I have come up with 50 super facts and made 50 posts about those super facts, but I am hoping to come up with hundreds. I am open to suggestions for super facts as well as critique of super facts. Tell me if you think it is trivia, not important, not surprising, or not an established fact. To see the first 50 super facts click here.
Smash your old beliefs with new surprising facts, super facts. Expand your mind. Shutterstock ID: 1685660680 by MattL_Images
Deciding on What is an Important Fact
Deciding what is an important fact or not is subjective, but for the same reason it also makes it an easy thing to decide. Ultimately, I decide what is important. It is difficult to compare the importance of facts, but my main concern is to avoid trivia. I also try to avoid facts that may be important to me but do not concern others very much.
For example, I am looking for facts that people discuss a lot, or are often mentioned in the mainstream media, or facts that people dispute fiercely despite a scientific consensus and overwhelming evidence telling us what is true. I am looking for facts from science that could change people’s perspective on nature, our world, or the universe, or facts that could change people’s view of the world, that are related to important historical events, such as the deaths of millions of people, etc.
Shocking Facts
Deciding whether a fact is highly surprising, misunderstood by many, shocking, or contentious and disputed is also not an exact science. In some cases, there are polls stating how common a certain belief is amongst the public but in most cases (that I consider) I have no polls to fall back on. I just have to use my judgment. In some cases, almost everyone I’ve spoken to about the subject is misinformed, bamboozled, or they misunderstand it. In other cases, I need to decide based on my impression. I have to guess.
Super facts can be surprising, shocking, or something you refuse to believe, and yet they are true. Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com
Finding the Truth
As I mentioned, deciding on what is important or highly surprising is not an exact science. I think that is OK. There’s going to be super facts that are impressive and some that are less so. However, the third criteria is the one thing that I need to get right, and that is whether the fact is true or not.
We humans are not very rational, and we often believe with intense conviction things which are false. I think that is true for all of us. We don’t know what those false beliefs are, otherwise, we wouldn’t have them. However, this is where the super facts can come in handy, as tools for personal growth if we are willing to change our minds in the face of new evidence. This is easier said than done since we are emotional beings embedded in our culture, our tribal attachments and favorite myths. We have biases, we jump to conclusions, we overestimate our understanding of subjects we don’t know much about (see the Dunning Kruger effect), and we tend to believe what we want to believe. That goes for me too.
Adding to the difficulty on deciding what is true is the fact that the internet and especially social media is full of misinformation. There are an enormous amount of YouTube videos, podcasts, and websites touting false claims, conspiracy theories, and pseudo-science. There are political think tanks deceiving the public and industry funded organizations spending billions of dollars on misinformation, as well as people claiming to have special insights and superior knowledge.
I see the most ridiculous claims on Facebook and Instagram on a daily basis and the amazing thing is that people fall for it. If it supports their pre-existing beliefs or opinions, they see it as proof or conclusive evidence and they don’t take the time to question the source. When I see this, I often point out that the source is not reliable, or it may even be a satirical site, and I often add something from Snopes to my comment assuming they’ve investigated it.
Sure, when I do this, I am raining on someone’s parade, and it is quite often not welcome. No matter how politely I try to explain the situation I end up getting insulted or blocked. I should say, I’ve also fallen for fake information myself, but I try to accept it when someone points it out to me using reliable sources. The point is, we humans are really bad at deciding what is true, and we underestimate how bad at it we are, and deciding what is true is often a quite challenging task.
Before I publish a super fact, I need to be fairly certain that it is true. Outside of mathematics and logic you cannot be 100% sure about anything, but some facts we can say with very high certainty are true. For example, the earth is not flat like a pancake, the Sun is bigger than the earth, the capital of the United States is Washington DC, the heart pumps the blood, we breathe oxygen, carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, the light speed in vacuum is a universal constant, time dilation is real, Cesium-137 is radioactive, etc. Most likely you only know a very tiny fraction of a percentage of the facts that we know to be true with very high certainty. Some of those facts will surprise you, shock you, or are facts you would like to dispute, and I call them super facts.
Determining What Facts Are True
When I determine whether something is true with a high degree of certainty I start with my own expertise. For example, when someone claims that the second law of thermodynamics (entropy) contradict evolution I know that to be false because I have a degree in physics (master’s degree) and I’ve taken several classes in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. In addition, I am very familiar with the faulty argumentation behind the claim because I’ve read dozens of creationist books. Yes, I was once bamboozled by creationism myself. Then I learned more about science, evolutionary biology, physics and thermodynamics.
Second law of thermodynamics Shutter Stock Vector ID: 2342031619 by Sasha701
However, my personal expertise is not enough. I also find out about scientific consensus or expert consensus and evidence from reliable sources. I should say that using scientific consensus as a reliable indicator that something is true does not fall under the “appeal to authority fallacy”. The “appeal to authority fallacy” refers to appealing to influential people or organizations who may not necessarily be experts, and regardless of the evidence. In science you don’t really have authorities, you have experts who often disagree with each other. In the event almost all experts agree on a certain fact that has been thoroughly vetted you can trust that fact with nearly 100% certainty, and that is not appeal to authority but a probability argument.
I typically select several reliable sources such as research papers published in respectable journals, national academies, government websites such as NASA, NOAA, EPA, FBI, respected research organizations such Our World in Data, Pew Research Center, and academic publications and books. I make sure that they various sites I find don’t contradict each other regarding my prospective super fact. If they all seem to agree I accept the super fact and include a few of the links in my post.
If I don’t have much personal expertise on a subject I start out by asking Google AI. I don’t ask ChatGPT because I believe it is less reliable with respect to information. Then I check Wikipedia and or another online encyclopedia such as encyclopedia Britannica. This is not to establish the truth but to get an idea. Wikipedia is not an academically acceptable source, but it is rarely wrong and serves as a good first filter to save time. Then I start focusing on the reliable sources above and I will make sure I understand the evidence.
So, in summary I will use my expertise, scientific consensus, reliable sources and better, agreement between reliable sources, to determine if I can say with confidence that something is true. I will also frequently include links from Wikipedia in my posts because Wikipedia typically feature good summaries that are easy to understand. Naturally, anyone is free to dispute any of my super facts. Just make sure you provide good evidence from an arguably reliable source, or I cannot take it seriously.
Fact or myth. Shutterstock Asset id: 2327968607
Sources I will not consider are claims from unreliable sources, political think tanks, talk show hosts, politicians, articles written by contrarians heavily funded by industry or political organizations, and random Reels or YouTube videos, and I will not entertain conspiracy theories for my purposes. Also, I will ignore, articles with click bait titles, sources making claims about a great swindle by the scientific community, articles claiming everyone is lying to you, articles purporting to reveal the hidden truth, articles insisting on presenting the truth that “they”/the-others won’t tell you, etc. Cults will tell you that everyone else is lying to you. I’ve learned not to fall for it at this point.
My Super Fact List
Finally, here are a few examples of my super facts.
So, on what subject(s) am I an authority? My understanding on what being an authority on a subject means is that it is being an expert with recognized credibility on that subject. However, the word “authority” has so many other meanings and it brings to mind the “appeal to authority fallacy”. The “appeal to authority fallacy” refers to appealing to influential people or organizations who may not necessarily be experts, and regardless of the evidence.
In science you don’t really have such authorities, you have experts who often disagree with each other. In the event almost all experts agree on a certain fact that has been thoroughly vetted you can trust that fact with nearly 100% certainty, and that is not appeal to authority but a probability argument. Therefore, I don’t really like the use of the word authority in this context. It is confusing. I would have preferred the question to be “In what subject(s) do you have recognized expertise?”
This is the front page of my PhD thesis “Reflex Control for Obstacle Avoidance and Self Preservation”.
Robotics
Reflex Control for Obstacle Avoidance and Self Preservation
My PhD thesis was in Robotics, specifically Reflex Control for Obstacle Avoidance and Self Preservation. Therefore, you can say that I am an expert on Reflex Control for Obstacle Avoidance and Self Preservation, Reflex Control (in Robotics) as well as Robotics. My expertise has been recognized through my published research papers, the citing of those papers, my PhD thesis, and my peers including Rodney Brooks.
Rodney Brooks is a former director of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, founder of several robotics research companies, and he is arguably the most famous roboticist in the world. In the 1990’s he was featured on the front page in national magazines such as Time Magazine several times. During my internship at the Robotics Lab at Sandia National Laboratory in Albuquerque, New Mexico in 1993, I spoke to Rodney Brooks about my research, and he congratulated me on my research, which he liked.
Briefly, reflex control in Robotics refers to functionally simple, quick, and reliable behaviors that override whatever more complex algorithms or humans (joystick / telerobotics) are commanding in case those algorithms or humans execute dangerous motion. Take for example, a robot moving quickly among multiple objects and the path planning algorithm generates a faulty command that would result in a collision when executed. The reflex control layer would detect the problem (assuming it knows about the objects) and halt the robot before it collided with the object. This would need to happen quickly, in milliseconds, and always in a failsafe way. After the collision has been avoided the system or the human can figure out what went wrong and figure out a new path.
To do this the Reflex controller needs to be embedded with the motion controller, and know the characteristics of the motors, the robot configuration, and mechanical characteristics, such as mass, friction model, inertia, etc., exactly. The result is that when you drive a robot around among multiple objects such as boxes hanging from the ceiling, coat racks, and sombreros, and other robots it will avoid colliding with these objects regardless of input from people or high-level path planning algorithms. It looked like the objects were protected by an invisible force field.
This is an old black and white photo of the Robotics Research Corporation Robot surrounded by objects including boxes hanging in the ceiling, a coat rack, and a control cabinet. I took the photo, and I created the software for the robot and placed the objects in its workspace.
Robot Kinematics
In addition, to “Reflex Control for Obstacle Avoidance and Self Preservation” or “Reflex Control for Robots”, which is very narrow field, I gained expertise in fields of robotics that are a bit wider. One such field is robot kinematics. That includes, for example, calculating the position, speed and acceleration of the tool tip (the end tip) of the robot from the position and motion of the joints of the robot. Or it could be calculating the possible joint angles from the position of the tool tip. The RRC robot was a seven-jointed robot so this could get complicated. I should say that when I worked for ABB Robotics (after my Ph.D) I created the kinematic models for 30+ of ABB Robotics robots. Therefore, I have expertise and recognized credibility in Robot Kinematics as well.
The drawing shows the seven joints, the seven possible rotations around those joints, the seven joint angles (the thetas), and the seven coordinate systems and their origos (the O’s) at each joint.
Robot kinematics can get complicated, at least for a seven-jointed robot like the RRC Robot. An example is the Jacobian, which is a matrix that relates joint velocities to end-effector / tool-tip velocities. The Jacobian is crucial for understanding and controlling robot motion, particularly for inverse kinematics and trajectory planning. Below is the Jacobian for the first four joints of the RRC robot. I spent an entire day deriving it. Depending on your eyesight it is difficult to read the scribbles, but it is a bunch of very long, mostly trigonometric equations. Don’t worry about understanding the matrix, it is just to show how complicated robot kinematics can get.
First part of the 4-dimensional (first four joints) Jacobian for the RRC Robot.Second part of the 4-dimensional (first four joints) Jacobian for the RRC Robot.Third part of the 4-dimensional (first four joints) Jacobian for the RRC Robot.Fourth part of the 4-dimensional (first four joints) Jacobian for the RRC Robot.
Configuration Space in Robotics
Another subject I gained a lot of expertise in is configuration space or so-called C-space. It is related to robot kinematics. C-space is a mathematical representation of all possible configurations a robot can take. In C-space for a robot arm (like the RRC Robot) the coordinates are the joint angles instead of X, Y and Z. For the seven-jointed RRC robot you have seven joint angles and C-space is thus seven dimensions. C-space is very useful if you succeed in representing obstacles in it. A point might become a curve, or multi-dimensional membrane in C-space, and a ball might become a multi-dimensional banana. I had a lot of fun creating algorithms for creating C-space with obstacles in it.
My Other Expertise
I also have a degree a master’s degree in engineering physics (Teknisk Fysik) from Uppsala University in Sweden. I should say that engineering physics in Uppsala was focused a lot on theoretical physics and modern physics as well as practical applications for physics. Case Western Reserve University later converted this degree to a master’s in electrical engineering. I loved physics and was a good student, but my special interest was the theory of relativity. Even though I had and still have a hard time with the General Theory of relativity and I studied the special theory of relativity way beyond what was required at school, and I read dozens of technical books on the subject. So, this is also sort of an area expertise for me.
Below are some links to topics related to the special theory of relativity on this website:
I spent at least 30 years working with software as a software engineer / robotics engineer and gained a lot of experience in software development. It was mostly embedded software but also graphical user interfaces, things you can see on a screen, and Networking Software Development. I worked a lot with Visual Studio, a powerful, expandable, and popular integrated development environment (IDE) from Microsoft.
I developed a lot of code using C++ and C#, .Net, WPF, but also other languages and libraries. I started with Visual Studio 97 (in 1997), then Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .NET 2002, Visual Studio .NET 2003, Visual Studio 2005, Visual Studio 2008, Visual Studio 2010, Visual Studio 2012, Visual Studio 2015, Visual Studio 2017, but I never got around to Visual Studio 2019 and Visual Studio 2022. So, you can say that I am an expert on Visual Studio with C++ and C# and .NET (I am less of an expert on the other languages typically used with Visual Studio).
Later in life I also came to learn a lot about climate change / climate disruption / global warming / the greenhouse effect whatever you call it. I used to be skeptical about climate change, and I thought it might be politicized by the scientific community, but after some interesting red flags I took a deep dive into the subject, and I learned that climate change is very real and caused by us. I was politicized not the scientific community. There is a scientific consensus on the subject for very good reasons. I continued by reading dozens of climate science papers and several dozens of technical and non-technical books on the topic. Therefore, at this point I know more about it than a lot of people. Maybe expert is a strong word, but almost expert.
Least but not last
Being a Leonberger Dog Expert
I know a lot about Leonbergers because my family was lucky enough to live with one for thirteen years. His name was Le Bronco von der Löwenhöhle—but we called him “Bronco” for short. Bronco wasn’t our only dog, but our world wouldn’t have been the same without him. For instance, he once saved the life of our pug by fending off an attack from another dog. He probably saved our Labrador’s life, too, by sniffing out an impending insulin shock before it happened. Then there was the time he scared off a trespasser who’d been terrorizing my wife and other women in the neighborhood.
Bronco loved to dance and hug. Here he is giving me a hug (not yet fully grown).
Bronco is no longer with us, but even in his passing he was distinctive. Leonbergers tend to live less than nine years—but Bronco came very close to reaching his thirteenth birthday. In fact, he received an award for longevity called the “Grey Muzzle Award.” We already knew he was a special dog, but we sent his DNA to two labs for research anyway. I wrote a book about our amazing Bronco and his many amusing adventures and included helpful information on Leonbergers for new owners and interested dog lovers. I also have a Leonberger website.
In the process of writing my book about Bronco and Leonbergers I came to learn a lot about Leonberger dogs, the Leonberger breed standard, their history, health issues, Leonberger organizations, health and care, etc. I became a bit of a Leonberger expert. If you are interested in the book, check it out here or here. You can also get it from Amazon in many other countries, Barnes & Noble, Chapters Indigo and many other bookstores. For more information check here.
Super fact 50 : There are hundreds of types of beer but in general they fall into two main categories, ales and lagers, and these two categories are not differentiated based on color. The ales are not necessarily dark and lagers light. There are light colored ales and dark, even black ales. There are light colored lagers and dark and almost black lagers (Schwarzbier). The difference between ales and lagers is the type of yeast used and the fermentation temperature. Ales are typically made with top-fermenting yeast at warmer temperatures. This result is a wider range of flavors and aromas, often with fruity or spicy notes. Lagers, on the other hand, are made with bottom-fermenting yeast at cooler temperatures making them crisper and more subtle. Ales have been around for 6,000 years. The lager is a more recent invention.
I consider this a super fact, first, because even though beer is a well-known drink that a lot of us drink almost every day, a lot of people don’t know what the two basic kinds of beer are. They don’t know what an ale is or what a lager is. Even beer fans and many people who drink beer every day are often clueless about this, the most basic fact about beer. A lot of people say that they like light/blond beer or they like dark beer. In my native country Sweden, which I admit is not a true beer country, I often hear people say that they prefer “ljus öl” (light/blond beer) rather than “mörk öl” (dark beer), or the other way around, which is like saying that you like blond / light colored food rather than dark colored food. It doesn’t make sense.
This is a so called Schwarzbier that I drank some time ago. Das Schwarze a German Schwarzbier from Dinkelacker-Schwabenbräu, ABV 4.9%. Some roasted notes, sweet caramel, light flavor, a bit fizzy, somewhat thin but good enough. This is a Lager but notice a how dark it is, basically black. I did not put black dye in it. It is how they really look despite being Lagers.
I am in the process of learning Franch, and I’ve discovered that this confusion is even baked into the French language. Well as you might guess France is not a true beer country. If you use Google Translate and you type in “Lager” in the English edit box the answer you get in French is “Bière blonde”, even though French and Belgian beer that are labeled Blonde frequently are Ales not Lagers. I’ve read a lot of French language sites mentioning beer, and unless the author has some beer expertise, they make the same mistake as Google Translate. Blonde / light beer is not Lager, and dark beer is not necessarily Ale.
I had a discussion about this with one of my French teachers and despite me having talked a lot about beer in class and having previously shown him that I knew something about the topic, he had a very hard time accepting the truth. After a Google search he finally accepted the truth, but he was very surprised, perhaps even shocked.
The confusion is immense, it is worldwide, and the truth is surprising to some people. I should mention that Americans for the most part get this right. In general Americans know that Lager isn’t necessarily blonde and vice versa. They know that IPAs, which are not Lagers but Ales, typically are light colored. Perhaps because of the prominent craft beer industry in the US. I should also mention that there are also hybrid beer styles and beer styles that are hard to classify as lager or ale. More about that later.
This is Ba Ba Black Lager, an American Schwarzbier. I had sushi with this Schwarzbier.
Secondly, lagers, especially pale bland mass-produced lagers have become so common that when people taste an ale, especially if it is a little bit different, like fruity, tart, have chocolate or coffee flavors, etc., they don’t even consider it a real beer. In their minds real beer is a bland tasting lager. Never mind that we have had Ales for 6,000 years, and that Ales dominated beer drinking up to relatively modern times. Nowadays 90% of beer consumption worldwide is lagers (87% in the US), but throughout most of human history nearly 100% of beer consumption worldwide was ales.
This is an IPA called Cold War. IPAs are NOT Lagers. However, notice how light the color is. IPAs are popular in the US, which I think is one reason Americans are better educated on the difference between lagers and ales to countries that are not part of the European beer countries (Germany, Britain, Ireland, Belgium, the Czech Republic, etc.)
What is an Ale?
As mentioned, an Ale is a style of beer, brewed using a warm fermentation method. Ales are typically made with top-fermenting yeast at warmer temperatures. This result is a wider range of flavors and aromas, often with fruity or spicy notes. The word ale is an English word which in medieval England meant a drink brewed without hops (it is not what it means today). Some popular ales include IPA, Pale Ale, Stouts, Porter, Scotch Ale, and Barley Wine. Below is a more complete list of Ales. The list is from the beer advocate. Despite the 120 styles listed the list is not complete. It should be noted that I’ve added a few that were missing.
India Pale Ales : American IPA, Belgian IPA, Black IPA, Brut IPA, Cold IPA, English IPA, Imperial IPA, Milkshake IPA, New England IPA.
Pale Ales : American Amber / Red Ale, American Blonde Ale, American Pale Ale, Belgian Blonde Ale, Belgian Pale Ale, Bière de Garde, English Bitter, English Pale Ale, English, Pale Mild Ale, Extra Special / Strong Bitter (ESB), Grisette, Irish Red Ale, Kölsch, Saison.
Wild/Sour Beers : Berliner Weisse, Brett Beer, Faro, Flanders Oud Bruin, Flanders Red Ale, Fruit Lambic, Fruited Kettle Sour, Gose, Gueuze, Lambic, Wild Ale.
Wheat beers : American Dark Wheat Beer, American Pale Wheat Beer, Dunkelweizen, Grodziskie, Hefeweizen, Kristallweizen, Witbier.
Stouts : American Imperial Stout, American Stout, English Stout, Foreign / Export Stout, Irish Dry Stout, Oatmeal Stout, Russian Imperial Stout, Sweet / Milk Stout.
Porters : American Porter, Baltic Porter, English Porter, Imperial Porter, Robust Porter, Smoked Porter.
Dark Ales : Dubbel, Roggenbier, Scottish Ale, Winter Warmer.
Brown Ales : Altbier, American Brown Ale, Belgian Dark Ale, English Brown Ale, English Dark Mild Ale.
Strong Ales : American Barleywine, American Strong Ale, Belgian Dark Strong Ale, Belgian Pale Strong Ale, English Barleywine, English Strong Ale, Imperial Red Ale, Old Ale, Quadrupel (Quad), Scotch Ale / Wee Heavy, Tripel, Wheatwine.
Specialty Beers: Ancient Herbed Ale, Sahti.
Trappist Westvleteren from Brouwerij Westvleteren (Sint-Sixtusabdij van Westvleteren) a Belgian Quadruple might be the most renowned beer in the world. I’ve had it many times and it is heavenly. However, it is very difficult to get in the US. A Quadruple is a type of Ale.Plutonium-239 from the Manhattan Project Brewing Company in Dallas, Texas. It is a strong-tasting Porter with coconut flavors. (chocolate, coconut and coffee). There is no clear definition on the difference between porter and stout, other than porters are in general milder and not as strong as stouts. From that perspective Plutonium-239 is really a stout.
Wild Ales and Sour Beers often have fruity flavors. This can be achieved by adding fruits or berries to them but often fruit flavors emerge naturally from the fermentation process, which, at least if you use wild yeast, produce esters (fruit flavors). Wheat beers often have banana or pear notes and just as for Wild Ales these flavors emerge naturally from the fermentation process (esters again). Some of the IPAs also have distinct fruit flavors, especially the New England style IPAs, but in this case the fruit flavors come from the hops.
Jester King in Texas brews a Wild Ale called Atrial Rubicite. It is a Wild Ale infused with raspberries. The fermentation process uses “wild yeast” to create a tart and fruity base but raspberries are added to enhance the fruit flavor resulting in a thick full raspberry flavor which most people describe as heavenly.
What is a Lager?
As mentioned, lagers are made with bottom-fermenting yeast at cooler temperatures making them crisper and more subtle. The word lager (German) means to storage or storeroom and used to refer to beers stored at cold temperatures. Sometime in the 15th century cold fermentation yeast emerged, and people started using it to do fermentation at cold temperatures. As time went by this form of fermentation became more popular. It was brought to the US in 1840 and between 1860 and 1870 it became the most popular fermentation process in Bohemia. As mentioned, today 90% of beer consumption worldwide is lagers.
Below is a more complete list of Lagers. The list is from the beer advocate.
Pale Lagers: American Adjunct Lager, American Lager, Czech / Bohemian Pilsner, Czech Pale Lager, European / Dortmunder Export Lager, European Pale Lager, European Strong Lager, Festbier / Wiesnbier, German Pilsner, Helles, Imperial Pilsner, India Pale Lager (IPL), Kellerbier / Zwickelbier, Light Lager, Malt Liquor.
Dark Lagers : American Amber / Red Lager, Czech Amber Lager, Czech Dark Lager, European Dark Lager, Märzen, Munich Dunkel, Rauchbier, Schwarzbier, Vienna Lager.
Specialty Lagers : Japanese Rice Lager, Chile Beer
Paulaner is a so called Festbier (or Octoberfest), which is type of Lager made especially for Octoberfest in Germany.
Finally, there are also specialty beers that are hybrids, or neither or that can be both.
Hybrid (Ale/Lager): Bière de Champagne / Bière Brut, Braggot, California Common / Steam Beer, Cream Ale.
Neither lager or ale, or can be both : Fruit and Field Beer, Low-Alcohol Beer, Rye Beer, Smoked Beer, Herb and Spice Beer, Kvass, Gruit, Happoshu, Pumpkin Beer.
That’s 120 styles of beer. I’ve had 110 beer styles. How many have you had?
Kevin’s artistic picture above makes me think of Alien Civilizations. Do they exist? Do they exist in our Galaxy? To quote Enrico Fermi, if they do exist “Where is Everybody?”. That is the famous Fermi Paradox.
Did we find an advanced civilization in our Galaxy, which has hundreds of billions of stars?
We have found thousands of exoplanets, and it is estimated that there are 11 billion potentially habitable Earth-sized planets orbiting stars roughly the same size as the sun in the Milky Way. It is estimated that there are an additional 40 billion potentially habitable Earth-sized planets orbiting red dwarf stars in the Milky Way. Earth is an estimated 4.5 billion years old whilst our Milky Way Galaxy is an estimated to be 13.6 billion years old. Add that there are at least hundreds of billions of Galaxies like the Milky Way in the observable Universe. Yet, human astronomers have not detected any signs of alien civilizations, and there is no evidence Earth has been visited by aliens in the past.
It should be noted that even though our Galaxy is 13.6 billion years old, its beginnings were very violent with a lot of supernova explosions, which were necessary for higher elements to come into existence and making life possible. So, we need to count out the first couple of billions of years. This is a supernova explosion in the center of the Andromeda galaxy “Elements of this image furnished by NASA” It is essentially an enhanced photo of a supernova explosion in a neighboring galaxy. Stock Photo ID: 2495486227 by muratart.Exoplanets, we found thousands but there are likely many billion habitable exoplanets in our Galaxy. This is an imagined Earth like exoplanet. Stock Illustration ID: 1440413666 by Dotted Yeti.This is an illustration of a real exoplanet that we’ve found. J1407b is an exoplanet 20 times more massive than Saturn. It has enormous rings and is often referred to as Super Saturn. It may not harbor life. Stock Illustration ID: 2329821675 by Love Employee.
In this context, I would like to mention the Drake equation. The Drake equation is a probabilistic equation used to estimate the number of communicative extraterrestrial civilizations in the Milky Way Galaxy. It was created in 1961 by American astrophysicist and astrobiologist Frank Drake. This is the equation N = R * Fp * Ne * Fl * Fi * Fc * L. where N is the number of civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy with which communication might be possible.
R = the average rate of star formation in our galaxy.
Fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets.
Ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets.
Fl = the fraction of planets that could support life that actually develop life at some point.
Fi = the fraction of planets with life that go on to develop intelligent life (civilizations).
Fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space.
L = the length of time for which such civilizations release detectable signals into space.
We have a pretty good idea of what R * Fp * Ne is but the remaining factors are unknown.
Exoplanet with life Stock Illustration ID: 1524001694 by Dotted Yeti
This is not really a super fact but more of a mystery. The goal of this blog is to create a list of what I call super facts. Important facts that we to be true, and yet they are disputed by many non-experts, or just highly surprising to the general public. However, I also post interesting facts and book reviews in this blog.
Is there Scientific Evidence for Alien Civilizations?
UFO sightings are not proof of alien spacecraft. The term “UFO” or “Unidentified Flying Object”, simply describes something in the sky that a person can’t recognize. Studies by NASA, Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office show that the vast majority of these observations can be attributed to mundane phenomenon. Also, ask yourself, why would an alien civilization fly across interstellar space and only reveal themselves to random people with bad cameras and not to humanity as a whole. Why would they be flying around in little saucers? The typical flying saucer stories are not credible. Some UFO reports are also hoaxes or based on misidentified objects or misinterpretations of natural phenomena.
When I was in the Swedish army I was stationed near the Finnish Swedish border up north, which was close to Murmansk, a big Russian city which had the world’s largest navy base at the time. One night when I looked up in the sky I saw a shiny green elliptical shape in the night sky. It was quite big. I did not know what it was, but a lot of people called in to report it as a UFO. Were we being visited by space aliens as many believed. Some were even certain of it. No, it turned out to be Natrium cloud left behind by an intercontinental missile test launched from the Murmansk naval base.
Was it a spaceship like this that we saw in the sky? No it was just a boring Natrium cloud left by a Russian missile. This spaceship approaching a black hole was generated by an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system. Stock AI-generated image ID: 2448481683 AI-generated image Contributor Shutterstock AI Generator.
Stories about past visitations are often guesses and conjecture mixed up with misrepresentation and fabrications. These stories are not taken seriously by scientists. SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) has not found any definitive evidence of alien life. SETI have not detected any signals that convincingly can be attributed to an alien intelligence. In summary, there is no scientific evidence for aliens in the declassified UFO videos, in purported alien bodies, mutilated cows or in anything else.
But why have we not found any traces of alien intelligence? Where is Everybody? That’s the Fermi Paradox.
Solutions to the Fermi Paradox
Interstellar travel and interstellar communication are incredibly difficult. Maybe we should take the fact that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light seriously. You can always speculate about warping space and wormholes but that does not mean such travel is at all physically possible. The distances in the universe are enormous and require thousands or millions of years of travel even at speeds close to the speed of light. Likewise, those distances make communication difficult. Perhaps interstellar travel and communication is too difficult to be worth it.
The so called “Great Filters” hypothesis suggests that advanced civilizations don’t last that long. Maybe they self-destruct in nuclear wars or germ warfare. Perhaps they burn fossil fuels causing severe global warming ending civilization. Maybe AI destroyed their civilization. There could also be a great filter before intelligent life occurs. What if life itself is extremely unlikely to happen.
The “Dark Forest” hypothesis suggests that advanced civilizations are hiding to avoid detection from hostile advanced civilizations. A related idea is that there is a very advanced civilization in our galaxy, which destroys all other civilizations when they become too advanced and a potential threat. If that is true, maybe we shouldn’t advertise our existence using projects like SETI.
Another suggestion is that advanced civilizations are extremely rare because they can only arise under extremely rare conditions. Not only does a planet need to be habitable, but plate tectonics, climate, the shape of continents and oceans all to be just right for intelligent life and advanced civilizations to evolve. Also, consider the fact that intelligent human life existed for hundreds of thousands of years before the rise of civilization. Perhaps we are the only civilization in our Galaxy. Perhaps we are the first civilization in our Galaxy.
Yet another suggestion is that beings that are part of advanced civilizations eventually will escape into a virtual reality world or escape into other alternative worlds.
Here is a video giving an overview of the Fermi Paradox
I would like to end with a famous quote by the famous science fiction writer Arthur C. Clark “There are two possibilities: either we are alone in the Universe, or we are not. Both are equally terrifying,”
Super Facts 