Review of Atomic Awakening

I recently read a very interesting book on the history of nuclear power and its possible future, Atomic Awakening: A New Look at the History and Future of Nuclear Power by James Mahaffey. Something like 90% of the book was history, the history of physics, nuclear physics, the Manhattan project, the nuclear bombs, the nuclear tests, nuclear reactors, etc.

About 10% of the book examined the viability of nuclear power and discussed the public’s fear of it. His approach to that is something like; well, no wonder people are afraid of nuclear power, look at the history. However, that fear is still irrational. The awesome power of nuclear power can give us safe and clean energy, replace fossil fuels and fight global warming, and also take us to the stars. He points out that nuclear reactions are millions of times more powerful than chemical reactions.

What Are Isotopes?

I should explain what an isotope is. Atoms consist of a nucleus and electrons surrounding the nucleus. In the nucleus there are protons and neutrons (and some other stuff). Neutral atoms have an equal amount of electrons and protons, which determines what kind of element it is. Hydrogen has one electron and one proton. Helium has two electrons and two protons. Oxygen has eight electrons and eight protons, etc. The number of protons/electrons is called the atomic number of the element.

The number of protons plus the number of neutrons is called the mass number. Atoms of the same element but different number of neutrons are called isotopes. Uranium-235 or U-235 has 92 protons and 235 – 92 = 143 neutrons. The number if protons/electrons determine the chemical properties of the element. The number of neutrons determines nuclear properties such as the stability of the nucleus, radioactivity, etc., as well as the weight. Therefore U-238 and U-235 are identical chemically and look and feel the same, but U-235 is more radioactive, and you can use U-235 for fission but not U-238.

Illustration of nuclear chain reaction. Uranium-235 fission.
This is an illustration of a chain reaction with fission of a Uranium-235 isotope. Notice the atomic number (number of protons) is incorrectly stated as 95 in the picture. It is 92.  When I have time, I will fix that. Shutterstock Asset id: 73714504 by Mpanchenko.

Cesium-137 in my Pocket

Before I continue with my review of the book I am going to tell a story about my crazy adventure with a Cesium-137, a very radioactive and dangerous isotope. In fact, Atomic Awakening claims that Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 are the two isotopes of the greatest concern with regards to nuclear waste.

Once when I was a young student of engineering physics, I was around 20 years old, we were doing experiments with radioactivity. We were using Cesium-137. There were signs on the walls warning about radioactivity and the Cesium-137 sample was enclosed in a little house built from lead bricks. We were supposed to quickly remove the lead bricks, take out the sample, do the experiment quickly, put the sample back and enclose it with the lead bricks. However, I got distracted by something and put the Cesium-137 sample in the back pocket of my jeans.

I walked around school with the Cesium-137 sample in my back pocket the whole day and after school I went shopping at the grocery store still having it in my back pocket. I discovered it once I got back to my room. I put in a drawer and stayed as far away from it as I could. The next day I woke up early, put the sample in my bag, went to the lab at school and when no one was looking I put the sample back in the lead brick house.

No, I don’t have any extra heads growing out of my buttocks, and I did not turn into the Hulk, but so much for nuclear safety.

Atomic Awakening Formats

Atomic Awakening: A New Look at the History and Future of Nuclear Power by James Mahaffey comes in four formats. I bought the hardback format.

  • Hardcover –  Publisher : Pegasus Books (June 23, 2009), ASIN : 1605980404, ISBN-13 : 978-1605980409, 352 pages, item weight : 1.42 pounds, dimensions : ‎ 6.4 x 1.2 x 9.3 inches, it costs $49.29 on US Amazon. Click here to order it from Amazon.com.
  • Paperback –  Publisher – Pegasus Books (October 15, 2010), ISBN-10 : 1605981273, ISBN-13 : 978-1605981277, 368 pages, item weight : 12.8 ounces, dimensions : ‎ 6 x 0.92 x 9 inches, it costs $15.63 on US Amazon. Click here to order it from Amazon.com.
  • Kindle –  Publisher : Pegasus Books (October 15, 2010), ASIN : B004GUS68I, ISBN-13 : 978-1605982038, Item 369 pages, it costs $13.99 on US Amazon. Click here to order it from Amazon.com.
  • Audio–  Publisher : Audible Studios (September 24, 2013), Listening Length : 11 hours and 44 minutes, ASIN : B00FBPGS78, it costs $21.83 on US Amazon. Click here to order it from Amazon.com.
Front cover of hardback format of the book Atomic Awakening: A New Look at the History and Future of Nuclear Power By James Mahaffey
Front cover of hardback format of the book Atomic Awakening: A New Look at the History and Future of Nuclear Power. Click on the image to go to the Amazon page for the hardcover version of the book.

Amazon’s Description of Atomic Awakening

Nuclear power is a paradox of danger and salvation―how is it that the renewable energy source our society so desperately needs is the one we are most afraid to use?

The American public’s introduction to nuclear technology was manifested in destruction and death. With Hiroshima and the Cold War still ringing in our ears, our perception of all things nuclear is seen through the lens of weapons development. Nuclear power is full of mind-bending theories, deep secrets, and the misdirection of public consciousness, some deliberate, some accidental. The result of this fixation on bombs and fallout is that the development of a non-polluting, renewable energy source stands frozen in time.

It has been said that if gasoline were first used to make napalm bombs, we would all be driving electric cars. Our skewed perception of nuclear power is what makes James Mahaffey’s new look at the extraordinary paradox of nuclear power so compelling. From medieval alchemy to Marie Curie, Albert Einstein, and the Manhattan Project, atomic science is far from the spawn of a wicked weapons program. The discovery that the atom can be split brought forth the ultimate puzzle of the modern age: Now that the energy of the universe is available to us, how do we use it? For death and destruction? Or as a fuel for our society that has a minimal impact on the environment and future generations?

Outlining nuclear energy’s discovery and applications throughout history, Mahaffey’s brilliant and accessible book is essential to understanding the astounding phenomenon of nuclear power in an age where renewable energy and climate change have become the defining concerns of the twenty-first century.

My five-star review for Atomic Awakening

The Amazing History of Everything Nuclear

The book is divided into three parts with five chapters each. The first third of the book (titled the Fantasy) recounts the history of physics, electromagnetics, light, the Michelson-Morley experiment, relativity, the nonexistence of simultaneous events, Einstein’s miraculous year, atoms, spectrometry, atomic models, isotopes, the photoelectric effect, radioactivity, quantum physics, nuclear physics, nuclear decay, fission, fusion, and why nuclear reactions are millions of times more energetic than chemical reactions. I already knew a lot of this history having a degree in physics, but I did not know all of it and the way it was written made it very interesting.

The second third of the book (titled the Puzzle) describes the discovery of fission and fusion and it is explained why the isotopes Uranium-235 and Plutonium-239 (among 3000+ isotopes) were perfect for fission. The author provides an account of the Manhattan Project’s history, and he explains in a general sense how a nuclear reactor and a nuclear bomb work. This section reminded me of the movie Oppenheimer. He describes a bit about the various nuclear reactor designs and how the first nuclear submarine came into existence.

This part of the book is filled with interesting and surprising anecdotes about the various scientists. The first part of the book also contained many interesting anecdotes, but this part of the book really has some very interesting and crazy stories to tell. The author points out that because of Hitler there were many Jewish top scientist and other top scientists who had to flee Europe to the US, thus turning the United States into the scientific superpower it wasn’t before. He explains why the Germans did not have a chance creating a nuclear bomb. I found it interesting that the Soviets deduced that the US was working on a nuclear bomb from the fact that so many US. physicist stopped publishing in physics journals. Apparently, the Germans and the Japanese did not figure this out. However, silence is suspicious, very suspicious.

The third part of the book (titled the Paradox) is about what came after the Second World War. The author describes the development of better and safer nuclear reactors (BWR, PWR, CANDU, etc.) as well as giving us an overview of many nuclear accidents, one of them being the terrible Chernobyl accident, which largely happened because of the extremely dangerous and bad reactor design, a so called RBMK reactor. RBMK reactors are monsters that cannot be built in the West. He recounts the development of new nuclear bomb technology, such as thermonuclear bombs, more popularly called hydrogen bombs.

He also tells us about the large number of nuclear tests performed including the detonation of Tsar Bomba, the Soviet 50 Megaton bomb. It was 3,300 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb. He makes it clear that there were thousands of nuclear bomb tests, but he did not specify an exact number, but I looked it up. There’s been more than 2,000 nuclear tests corresponding to a yield of 42,000 Hiroshima bombs. Many of the tests were not military. For example, project plowshare was about making a bigger and deeper Panama Canal by blowing a series of deep holes through Panama using hydrogen bombs. There were 35 nuclear bombs tests to determine the feasibility of creating giant holes with hydrogen bombs. He also explains how a nuclear bomb driven spaceship works and how we could have used it for interstellar space travel (Project Orion).

Towards the end of the book, he successfully makes the case that modern Nuclear Power (not the RBMK of course) is safe and clean. We avoid pollution, and it can be used to fight global warming. The same is true for solar and wind. However, he argues that the base power source must be constantly running, high-output nuclear stations. He argues that the public got a very bad impression of anything nuclear because of how it all started with nuclear bombs, nuclear tests, bad reactor designs and accidents, and how misinformation and miscalculations added to the bad impression. We often ignore the many tens of millions of victims of fossil fuels, and the hundreds of thousands of deaths from hydro, while exaggerating the dangers of nuclear power.

However, in nuclear power we have an immense power source that we are eventually bound to start using. That’s the Atomic Awakening. One of the shocking statements in this part of the book is that “all the medical and industrial radioisotopes, used daily in impressive quantities in the United States, are made in one reactor in Canada”. He blamed this on irrational fear of nuclear power. I checked whether this scary situation still existed today. Luckily, it is not as bad. Medical and industrial radioisotopes are still all imported but they also come from Europe and Australia. It is not just one reactor in Canada. He states that “the Paradox of Nuclear Power is that far more people die each year of radiation-induced disease from standing out in the sun than have ever died from the application of nuclear power” (page 223).

There were a few things that I did not like about the book. The first is that the author often describes complex experimental setups, designs, or tools that really could be better understood with an illustration, or a picture, but there were none. I found a typo on page 308, where he refers to fission as fusion in the third sentence. I think he spent too little space on the feasibility of Nuclear Power in the modern world and maybe too much on the history of physics. Nuclear Power seems to be what the book should be about and yet this topic was concentrated to the last 10% of the book and I don’t think he made his case as well as he could have. The end of the book seems rushed. On the other hand, it was a fascinating journey before we got there. Overall, I think this book is extremely interesting, it was a fun to read, and it was fact filled and a great learning experience. I loved reading this book, so even though I have a few misgivings I still think it is a five-star book. I highly recommend it.

Back cover of hardback format of the book Atomic Awakening: A New Look at the History and Future of Nuclear Power By James Mahaffey
Back cover of hardback format of the book Atomic Awakening: A New Look at the History and Future of Nuclear Power. Click on the image to go to the Amazon page for the paperback version of the book.

Other Nuclear Related Posts


To see the Super Facts click here

Unknown's avatar

Author: thomasstigwikman

My name is Thomas Wikman. I am a software/robotics engineer with a background in physics. I am currently retired. I took early retirement. I am a dog lover, and especially a Leonberger lover, a home brewer, craft beer enthusiast, I’m learning French, and I am an avid reader. I live in Dallas, Texas, but I am originally from Sweden. I am married to Claudia, and we have three children. I have two blogs. The first feature the crazy adventures of our Leonberger Le Bronco von der Löwenhöhle as well as information on Leonbergers. The second blog, superfactful, feature information and facts I think are very interesting. With this blog I would like to create a list of facts that are accepted as true among the experts of the field and yet disputed amongst the public or highly surprising. These facts are special and in lieu of a better word I call them super-facts.

36 thoughts on “Review of Atomic Awakening”

    1. Thank you so much Robbie. Yes you are right. People easily do stupid mistakes. Another story about potentially dangerous human folly was when I was working for Ericsson in Stockholm. I was part of a team creating the electronics for a Swedish fighter Jet called JAS Gripen. We were given secret electronic schemas by the US and naturally what we developed was also secret. Therefore, we had what was called Red Vaxes, computers that were electronically isolated. They could never be on internet and could never be contacted from the outside. I did not realize that the computer I was working on was a Red Vax. I complained to the IT administrator, who was just a substitute because the real one was on vacation. He told me that “no wonder there is no cable attached to the computer”. He told me I will fix that Thomas. He went to get an ethernet cable and hooked it up.

      Later my manager came by and asked me what I was doing. I said I am writing to my future Professor at Case Western Reserve University in the US. This was 1988 before email so I was using an app called Unix Write. My manager laughed and said “Ha ha Thomas that won’t work because this is a Red Vax. There is no outside communication”. So I pointed to the screen and told him, “look he just answered me, the administrator hooked it up”. My manager had a look of shock in his face, and his face was getting redder. Then he ran out of the room in anger to get the administrator.

      Like

  1. I have heard about safer small nuclear reactors that could be an alternate to fossil fuels, but some say they are too expensive to build. There is also the matter of waste products. I think we need to use a variety of energy sources, of which nuclear may be one.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, they have started to investigate Small modular reactors, SMRs, but I think they have the potential to be both safer and cheaper, but we’ll see. According to this book nuclear waste is a political problem, or a fear problem, but not a real one. He says that there is a lot more radiation in the environment already and it can be stored very safely for a long time as it decays. I did not bring this up in my review, but he discussed it. Perhaps we’ll see in the future whether he is right.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Thank you very much for your very thorough review of this book. Very interesting and informative posts. I agree that the fear of nuclear power is unbalanced, but it think it derives more from the idea of that power falling into the hands of unstable governments who then use it to punish other nations. The arguments around it always come back to nuclear weaponry and its horrific effects.

    Right now, both the U.S. and Israel have demonstrated their position that Iran shouldn’t have access to nuclear power because it’s “unstable”. The breathtaking irony in this “belief” is hard to swallow and shows me that more often than not, we humans are playing with toys that are far too mature for our stage of social development. Until we grow up enough to avoid putting such people as Trump, Netanyahu and Khamenei in positions of power, the positives of nuclear reactors will remain firmly in the background.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I agree that unstable governments should not have nuclear weapons. That is very dangerous. It is important to remember though that PWR and BWR nuclear reactors only need enrichment of a couple of percent (2% U-235 98% U-238), and CANDU reactors can use natural Uranium, no enrichment (0.7% U-235, 99% U-238), whilst an atomic bomb needs at least 82% enrichment (82% U-235, 18% U-238). And the enrichment is a process that is different from having/using a nuclear reactor. Therefore, countries using PWR, BWR or CANDU reactors are safe. But I agree that the existence of nuclear weapons anywwhere are a very dangerous situation and any association with them is quite scary. It makes people afraid of nuclear reactors, even the ones that have nothing to do with nuclear weapons.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Another story of nuclear safety: My dearly beloved told me his high school chemistry teacher gave him a Geiger counter to work on because he couldn’t get it to zero. Outside the chemistry lab, it seemed to be working fine. The reason it appeared not to zero in the chemistry lab was a piece of uranium in the teacher’s desk drawer—right next to an important piece of personal equipment.

    I bet these stories are more common than people want to admit. But the picture of a student walking around the grocery store with Cesium 137 in his back pocket is not one I’m going to forget.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you for the story Denise. I can add that Cesium-137 is 150 million times more radiactive than Uranium-238 (natural Uranium) and 23 million times as radioactive than Uranium-235, enriched uranium for an atomic bomb. So Cesium-137 is really dangerous. Uranium is not especially dangerous, well unless you turn it into a nuclear bomb.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Great post, agree nuclear is an attractive alternative to fossil fuels. I suppose the issue is what to do with the spent fuel. The US had almost completed a disposal facility in a geologically inactive area of Nevada…Yucca Mountain…until last-minute local opposition nixed it.

    Interesting backstory about WWII and the suspicious sudden lack of posting in physics journals 🤔😂

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you so much Darryl. I should say that he discusses the spent fuel issue in the book but I did not mention it in my review. What he says though is that nuclear waste is a political problem, or a fear problem, but not a real one. He says that there is a lot more radiation in the environment already and the waste can be stored very safely for a long time as it decays. He basically claims that is not a real concern.

      Liked by 2 people

  5. The book sounds very interesting, especially after reading your threadbare analysis. I liked the description of “Cesium-137 sample in your back pocket.” Interesting facts!

    Liked by 1 person

        1. Thank you so much Kaushal. Speaking of doing stupid things. Here I go again. A few days ago I went for my annual check up at the doctor and it turns out that I have hypervitaminosis D. I basically poisoned myself by eating too many D-vitamin gummies. It says one per day on the bottles I bought but I ate about 5-10 per day because they taste good. I did not know that too many vitmains could be dangerous. Well that is something new I learned, but I guess I should have known, or guessed. Anyway, I stopped eating D vitamin gummies and I just have to drink lots of water and wait for it to come down, and hope that I don’t get a kidney stone or a heart attack in the meantime.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. This is new for me, Thomas. I was not aware that excessive vitamin D is so dangerous, but didn’t you notice any unusual symptoms? I understand your concerns, but here in India, more than 50% of people are vitamin D-deficient. But don’t worry, nothing will happen. My good wishes and prayers are with you!

            Liked by 1 person

            1. D-deficient is how I started out but apparently you have to follow the instructions on the bottle (one per day). Who knew? But seriously, they tasted good and I never thought too many vitamins could be dangerous, but it is. My doctor was a bit mad at me. I’ve done some stupid things. Walking around with a highly radiactive CS-137 sample in my pocket, ignoring a sign in the ski slope saying this slope is closed and then having a ski accident resulting in 3-days of amnesia, and now this. Thank you so much for your kindness Kaushal.

              Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Lynette d'Arty-Cross Cancel reply