Tag: Super Facts

Vaccines do not cause Autism

Super fact 61 : An overwhelming body of scientific evidence has proven that vaccines do not cause autism. In addition, research shows that Tylenol (acetaminophen) is not a likely cause of autism.

Autism is a complex disorder caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. It is estimated that approximately 80-90% of the risk for autism is genetic. There are other factors that also increase the risk for autism such as advanced parental age, birth complications, and prenatal exposure to certain chemicals or infections. However, despite what many people believe, or have heard, vaccines (and Tylenol) is not one of them.

vaccinating dog on white background, hiding covering eye | Vaccines do not cause Autism
No dog has ever gotten autism from a vaccine. The same is true for humans. Well, dogs don’t get autism in the first place. Shutterstock Asset id: 1676509894 by Vince Scherer

The belief that vaccines cause autism originated primarily from a single, fraudulent 1998 study published by Andrew Wakefield. The study falsely claimed a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in 12 children. Since then, dozens of high-quality scientific studies, involving millions of children across multiple countries, have found no link between vaccines and autism. One Danish study involved 657,000 children. Leading global health organizations such as CDC, WHO, the American Academy of Pediatrics AAP, have affirmed this conclusion. You can read more about it here, and here, and here. In general, routine vaccines has been shown to be safe.

Some studies have shown minor associations between acetaminophen and autism, but association, or correlation, is not causality. Tylenol is often used more often in challenging pregnancies. Research shows no causal link between Tylenol and autism. This is what Nature, a prestigious, leading weekly scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed research papers, says. You can read more here, here, and here.

If you focus on the medical research and what reputable medical associations say as opposed to social media memes, talk show hosts, and politicians say, it is obvious that this super fact is true. It is obviously important and yet a lot of people refuse to accept it, including a lot of people I personally know. That makes it a super fact. It is a true and important fact that is surprising or hard to accept for many people.

I try to avoid politics as much as possible in this blog but perhaps this post may seem political to some, but it really isn’t. It’s the government agencies, politicians, political think tanks and individuals who reject scientific evidence that does not support their agendas who are being overly political. Just presenting the facts does not make you political. Just like thermometers don’t have political parties (global warming) neither do statistical tools, DNA or viruses.

What about the Autism Epidemic?

It is true that autism diagnoses have increased by about 300% over the last 20 years. There are two main reasons for this increase. First, the definition of autism spectrum disorder has been broadened. Second, public health programs have increased screening that look for signs of autism at wellness visits for children ages 18–24 months. There is also an increased awareness about autism among parents and in society. The subgroup consisting of severe cases of autism has increased very little if at all. You can read more about that here.

However, it should also be noted that in addition to genetics, which is the major cause, certain factors such as higher parental age, air pollution, infections during pregnancy, obesity, diabetes, immune system disorders, low birthrate, extreme prematurity, are associated with an increased risk. Some of these factors have gotten worse. What is not the cause is vaccines. You can read more about that here, here, here, and here.

Related Super Facts

One of my super facts posts that is related to this post is:

Smallpox Killed 300 million People in the Last Century Before Eradication

A child with covered by severe blisters from smallpox.
Child with smallpox in Bangladesh 1975. Wikimedia commons photo by CDC/James Hicks.

There are also super facts that may not be directly related to this post but that share one particular feature with this super fact, and that is that they are frequent targets of denial, derision, mockery, and misrepresentation by some (or many) of our political leaders.

To see the other Super Facts click here

Electric Charge is not the only type of Fundamental Charge

Super fact 59 : Most people have heard of electrical charges, positive and negative. However, in nature there are also color charges—red, green, and blue—which are analogous to electric charges. In addition, there are anti-red, anti-green, and anti-blue charges.

Esther’s writing prompt: 10th September : Charge

Click here or here  to join in.

As you may know, atoms consist of particles. Electrons surround the nucleus of the atom. The nucleus of the atom is in the middle of the atom and it consists of protons and neutrons. Electrons have a negative charge. Protons have a positive charge. Neutrons do not have an electrical charge. Electrons are so called elementary particles. They are not composed of other particles. Protons and Neutrons, on the other hand, are not elementary particles. They are composite particles consisting of quarks, gluons and quark pairs called mesons.

The picture shows a Hydrogen atom consisting of one proton and one electron, one Carbon atom with six electrons, six protons and six neutrons, an Oxygen atom with eight electrons, eight protons and eight neutrons, and a Nitrogen atom with seven electrons, seven protons and seven neutrons | Electric Charge is not the only type of Fundamental Charge
Four elements with a nucleus and electron shells. The number of electrons, protons, and neutrons is shown. The green particles circling the nucleus are electrons. The red particles in the nucleus (middle) are protons and the blue particles in the nucleus are neutrons. The colors of the particles in this picture have nothing to do with color charges. The four elements are Hydrogen, Carbon, Oxygen, and Nitrogen. There are 118 elements. These elements can combine into millions of different kinds of molecules that make up everything. Asset id: 1555863596 by OSweetNature.

Quarks have electric charges, just like an electron and a positron, which is why a proton has an electric charge, a positive electric charge. However, in addition quarks have something called color charge. Unlike electric charges, which come in two forms, negative and positive, they come in three forms red, green and blue and in anti-red, anti-green, and anti-blue (well six forms actually). I should say that the color charges, red, green and blue, are not real colors. They are just names. Just electric charges are associated with electric forces; color charges are associated with the nuclear strong force. The strong force is even stronger than the electrical force.

If you take an equal amount of positive and negative electric charges you get something that is electrically neutral. If you take an equal amount of red, green and blue you get what is called white, or neutral. If you take an equal amount of red and anti-red you also get white. Any other mix gives you a net color charge.

vector illustration of up and down quarks in proton and neutron on white background. The proton (left) is a red and blue up quark and a green down quark. The neutron is a red and green down quark and a blue up-quark.
The proton and neutron each consist of three quarks. Protons consist of two up quarks and one down quark. Neutrons consist of two down quarks and one up quark. Both protons and neutrons have a net white charge. The yellow squiggly lines are gluons transporting color charge between the quarks. Asset id: 2333679305 by KRPD.

I can add that gluons are elementary particles that in many respects are like photons. Light consists of photons. It is because of the photons that we can see. In addition, the photons transport electrical charge. Photons are massless elementary particles with the intrinsic spin of one, and they belong to a group of elementary particles called Bosons. Gluons transport color charge, and they are massless and have an intrinsic spin of one and belong to the same group of elementary particles called Bosons. Unlike photons, they are stuck inside the nucleus and unlike photons they never get to see the light of day. The pun was intended.

Matter, light, and electrical charges are all part of our daily life. We can touch matter, see light, and we come across electrical charge when we touch something that is charged or when we see lightning. However, we do not come across quarks, gluons, and color charges in our daily life because they are hidden at the center of the atoms. Yet they are fundamental to the existence of matter, of us. We know color charges exist, the existence of color charges is an important fact, and yet it is not a well-known fact and often a big surprise to people. Therefore, I think it is a super fact.

The 118 Elements and the 3,500 Isotopes

There are 118 known elements. Why not 500, or just 4 or 5, like the ancient Greeks believed? Each element is defined by it having a certain number of protons and the same number of electrons if it is to be electrically neutral. The problem with having more than one proton in the nucleus is that protons all carry a positive charge and therefore want to push each other away. Same charges repel and different charges attract. What saves the nucleus from blowing apart are the neutrons and the associated strong nuclear force (protons & neutrons) which is guided by the color charges. The quantum model for electricity is called Quantum electrodynamics or QED. The quantum model for color charges is called Quantum chromodynamics or QCD.

As you add more protons it becomes increasingly more difficult for the nuclear forces (strong and weak) to hold the nucleus together. The positive charge of the protons is pushing too hard. That’s why there are only 118 Elements. Another thing to note is that the number of neutrons does not have to be the same as the number of protons. This means that for each element there are several kinds of so-called isotopes. For example, carbon has six protons and six electrons (if the atom is electrically neutral) but the carbon atom / element can have six neutrons, seven neutrons, or eight neutrons. You call them carbon-12, carbon-13, and carbon-14, where the number represents the number of protons plus the number of neutrons.

The picture shows a Carbon-12 isotope, a Carbon-13 isotope, and a Carbon-14 isotope | Electric Charge is not the only type of Fundamental Charge
Three natural isotopes of Carbon Stock Vector ID: 2063998442 by zizou7
Bohr model representation of the uranium atom, number 92 and symbol U. Conceptual vector illustration of uranium-238 isotope atom, mass number 238 and electron configuration 2, 8, 18, 32, 21, 9, 2.
This is a simplified Bohr model of the Uranium atom. There are 92 little blue balls circling a nucleus in the middle of the atom. Those are electrons. In the nucleus there are 92 protons. Those are the red balls with plus signs. In addition, there is a yellowish smudge around the protons in the nucleus. Those are the neutrons. Depending on the isotope, there are 143 neutrons for U-235, 146 neutrons for U-238 and 142 neutrons for U-234. Shutterstock asset id: 1999370450 by Patricia F. Carvalho

It is the electrons that determine the chemical properties of an element, and therefore isotopes with a different amount of neutrons are chemically identical. However, they are different with respect to properties that relate to he nucleus, such as radioactivity/stability, and of course weight. Also, when atoms combine into molecules their chemical properties change drastically, but again that is due to the rearrangement of the electrons. There are around 3,500 known isotopes, most of them radioactive.

What is a Quark?

To learn more about Protons, Neutrons, Quarks, Gluons, Color Charges, and Quantum Chromodynamics you can watch this 10 minute video below.

Other Physics Related Superfacts

To see the other Super Facts click here

Time is a Fourth Dimension

Super fact 58 : In relativity, time is considered the fourth dimension, inseparable from the three spatial dimensions to form a four-dimensional continuum called spacetime. Adding time as a fourth dimension, not (x, y, z), but (x, y, z, t), results in spacetime measurements called spacetime intervals that all observers can agree on.

Before relativity the distance between two points was the same for all observers. The distance between points is calculated using the Pythagorean theorem: (d^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}). You calculate the distance between two end points in a coordinate system using Pythagoras theorem because the points make right angled triangles along the x-axis, y-axis and z-axis. See the picture below.

The image shows the formula for Pythagoras theorem in two and three dimensions and Pythagoras theorem applied to the distance between two points.
Pythagoras theorem in two and three dimensions which also apply to the distance between two points. The points are indicated in red.

Let say you add another coordinate system (x’, y’, z’). The new coordinate system could be translated and rotated compared to the first one. The values of (x, y, z) and (x’, y’, z’) would be different and yet the distance between point-1 and point-2 would be the same. Well as long as you don’t change units, like using meters in one coordinate system and feet in the other. The distance between the points would be a so-called invariant. Now imagine that you forgot to include one coordinate in Pythagoras theorem, for example, y and y’ or x and x’, then your calculation for the distance would be different for the two coordinate systems. We need all coordinates, or all dimensions. See the picture below.

The picture shows two different coordinate systems. One is rotated and translated compared to the other. There are also two points and the distance between them is indicated. The formula for Pythagoras theorem is shown for both coordinate systems.
Pythagoras theorem is used to calculate the distance between two points from two different coordinate systems, with different coordinate values for the points. You still have the same distance for both coordinate systems. The points are indicated in red.

 In relativity the length of objects, as well as the time between events is relative and varies from observer to observer. In other words, distance and time varies from coordinate system to coordinate system. However, if you add time to the three space dimensions and calculate the distance between events using the Pythagorean theorem for intervals (between two events): or  (s^{2}= x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2} – t^{2}) or (where the ‘t’ represents time in appropriate units), then the difference between different observers vanish. The interval is the same for all observers. It is a so-called invariant. The formula for the spacetime interval comes in a few different forms. One for distance like intervals (space distance bigger than time) (s^{2}= x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2} – t^{2}), and one for time like intervals (time is bigger than the space distance) (s^{2}= t^{2} – (x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})). There is also one that includes the imaginary number (s^{2}= x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2} + (it)^{2}). See below.

The image shows three formulas for the spacetime interval Euclidian: “(s^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}+(it)^{2}”. For Time like intervals, the standard form: “(s^{2} = t^{2} – (x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}))”. For distance like intervals: “(s^{2} = ((x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}) – t^{2}))”.
The three formulas for the spacetime interval above all assume that the unit used for time is the time it takes light in vacuum to travel the distance unit used. If that is meters, it would be the time it takes light to travel one meter. The top formula is the Euclidian form of spacetime. It contains only the ‘+’ operator at the expense of adding the imaginary number (square root of -1) in front of the time coordinate. The second form is typically used with time like intervals and considered the standard form. The third form is used when the distance between two events is larger than the time distance, or distance like intervals.

The interval concept was developed, not by Einstein, but by Hermann Minkowski (a few years after special relativity) and is often referred to as Minkowski space. Time is like a space coordinate but the opposite signs in the equation make it different. Based on articles I found it appears that the opposite signs (minus vs. plus) means that you cannot move “backwards” in time as you can in a space dimension.

I admit that this is a very abstract super fact, but it basically means that if you add time as an extra coordinate to the three space coordinates x, y, z you get something, the spacetime interval, that everyone regardless of speed, orientation, etc., agrees on, despite relativistic length contraction and despite time dilation and non-simultaneity.

Time Expressed in Appropriate Units

I would also like to explain what I mean by (where the ‘t’ represents time in appropriate units), as I stated in the above. For physical formulas to work they need to be expressed in consistent units. For example, you can’t use kilometers for the coordinate x, and miles for coordinate y, not without adding a constant to adjust for it. For the formula (s^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}-t^{2}) to work you need to express time in a unit that corresponds the time light travels in one meter if x, y and z are expressed in meters. If you express x, y, and z in meters and express time in seconds you must adjust the formula with the constant c = 299,792,458, the speed of light in meters per second, so you get (s^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}-(ct)^{2}). See the picture below.

The image shows the formulas for the spacetime interval with the constant representing the speed of light in vacuum “(s^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}+(ict)^{2}”, “s^{2}= (ct)^{2} – (x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})” and “(s^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}-(ct)^{2}”.
If you measure the space coordinates in meters and the time in seconds you must adjust the units to match by inserting the speed of light in vacuum c = 299,792,458. The three forms of the space interval now have the constant c attached to the time coordinate.

Time Like Space Intervals

The formula for time like intervals is typically used for the situation where the time component is larger than the space component, which also means that it is possible to physically travel between the two events forming the space interval. As you can guess, that is a pretty normal situation. Let’s say you are watching TV and having a pizza. Your sofa is your coordinate system. You turn on the TV and 100 seconds later you move 2 meters to get a slice of pizza. Let’s calculate the spacetime distance between those two events.

The space component is easy, that’s 2 meters. However, if we express time in the time it takes light (in vacuum) to travel one meter we get 100 times 299,792,458. If you express time in seconds, you adjust it using the constant c = 299,792,458, and again you multiply 100 with 299,792,458, which is 29,979,245,800. So, the distance in time is almost 15 billion times larger. You really did not move far in space, but you moved very far in time. Now ask yourself. Are you spending your time well?

The Minus in Front of the Time Coordinate

There is one obvious difference between time and the space coordinates. In a coordinate system you can walk forward, along let’s say, the x-axis and then walk back the same way. You can walk back and forth as many times as you want, no problem, but you cannot do that with time. Time may be a space-time coordinate, but it is different from the other three coordinates in that way, and that’s where the opposite signs in the formula for the space-time interval comes in. This is beyond the scope of this super fact blog post, but you can read more about this here and here.

Other Relativity Related Superfacts

To see the other Super Facts click here

Half the World’s Population Live within a 2 Percent Circle

Super fact 57 : Half the World’s Population live within a circle that covers 2% of the world’s surface, or 10% of earth’s land area. This circle is often referred to as the “Valeriepieris Circle” or Yuxi Circle, and it is centered on southeast Asia.

This circle, has a radius of a bit more than 2,000 miles, and encompasses densely populated areas of East and South Asia, including major population centers like China, India, and Indonesia. The original Valeriepieris Circle was created by a teacher named Ken Myers in 2013 and was larger (radius 2,500 miles) than the more optimized circle created in 2015. In 2015, Singaporean professor Danny Quah—with the aid of an intern named Ken Teoh created a significantly smaller circle (radius 2,050 miles) that included half the world’s population. 4.2 billion people live in the Valeriepieris Circle, which is 5.6 times as many people as in Europe and 12.4 times as many people as in the Unites States.

I consider this a super fact because it is true, it is an important fact, and it is a surprising fact to those of us who have not come across this information before. It is an important fact because it impacts how we view our world. The circle is located far away from Europe and North America, in a part of the world that is rising quickly economically. The people in this highly populated circle have different cultures, music, literature and religions from the US and Europe. They speak different languages, and they play different sports, well soccer (the real football) is international but not as common in the Valeriepieris Circle as in Europe or South America.

Those among us who live outside of this circle, for example, in the United States or Europe, probably need to pay more attention to this half of world. Especially, if you live in the United States, it is easy to believe that the world is about us. The existence of this circle demonstrates that this view is not a realistic view.

This is a world map showing all the continents with the colors of the Valeriepieris Circle inverted. It should be noted that the circle is quite small compared to the whole world | Half the World’s Population Live within a 2 Percent Circle | The original 2013 map by Ken Myers, with the interior of the circle.
The original 2013 map by Ken Myers, with the interior of the circle. Half as many people live inside the circle as outside the circle. However, it is larger and less optimized compared to the circle from 2015 below. This circle is NASA, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
This is a special geometric projection of planet earth showing the Valeriepieris Circle at the center. The proportion of the circle (yellow circle) and the whole earth is proportional, and the circle is obviously much smaller | Half the World’s Population Live within a 2 Percent Circle | Danny Quah's 2015 circle, on a Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection.
Danny Quah’s 2015 circle, on a Lambert azimuthal equal-area projection. It should be noted that the fraction of the area of the circle to that of the globe is equal to its equivalent on Earth. Again, half as many people live inside the circle as outside the circle. From Wikipedia cmglee, jimht at shaw dot ca, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0&gt;, via Wikimedia Commons.

Population of Southeast Asia

The countries that are part of the Valeriepieris Circle are, for example,

The map shows the countries in Southeast Asia as relatively large, especially, China and India. Almost the entire right-hand side of the map is filled with Southeast Asian countries making it easy to understand how just around 20 Southeast Asian countries can correspond to half the world’s population.
Each country’s size represents the size of the population in 2018. Each little square represents 500,000 people. All 15,266 squares show where the world’s 7,633 billion peopls lived in 2018 (now the world population is 8,244 billion people). Image from our World in Data. By Max Roser for OurWorldinData.org – the free online publication on the world’s largest problems and how to make progress against them.

Population Statistics

Most people know that in recent centuries the world population has grown almost exponentially but is now projected to level off sometime around the middle of this century. Europe is an interesting example. A thousand years ago Europe’s share of the world population was around 14.5%. Then came the scientific revolution and the industrial revolution and by 1900 it was 25%. As other countries around the world became industrialized Europe’s share of the world population shrunk, even though the population of Europe kept increasing, just slower. Now Europe’s share of the world population is 9%.

As countries become wealthier their population growth tends to slow down, not just in Europe, but around the world. The world’s population growth is illustrated by the image from Our World in Data below (starting 5,000 years ago, ending the year 2000) and the six minute YouTube video below from the American Museum of Natural History (starting 100,000 years ago and ending the year 2100). The YouTube video also shows the projected population decline beyond the year 2050.

Twelve maps depicting earth’s population distribution (population per square kilometer) at different twelve different times in history. The times are 3000BC, 2000BC, 1000BC, 1AD, 500AD, 1000AD, 1500AD, 1600AD, 1700AD, 1800AD, and 2000AD | Half the World’s Population Live within a 2 Percent Circle
Population per square kilometer. Source of the original visualization Klein Goldewijk, Beusen and Janssen (2010). Long term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. In the Holocene 20(4) 565-573. The original visualization was adapted by OurWorldinData.org

A somewhat related super fact is – Poverty and child mortality has been sharply reduced worldwide.

Next Super fact coming up is : Time is the fourth dimension

To see the other Super Facts click here

The Bermuda Triangle the Big Non-Mystery

Super fact 56 : The Bermuda Triangle mystery is a myth. There is not a higher risk of disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle. To be specific, disappearances do not occur in the so-called Bermuda Triangle, or Devils Triangle, with any higher frequency than in other comparable regions of the ocean. The “mystery” of the Bermuda Triangle is largely a manufactured one, perpetuated by sensationalized accounts that often misrepresent the facts and downplay the role of natural hazards like storms.

The number of ships and aircraft reported missing in the Bermuda Triangle is not significantly greater, proportionally speaking, than in any other part of the ocean. The U.S. Coast Guard, along with NOAA, the U.S. Navy, Lloyds of London who pays out insurance for ships and aircraft lost/missing at sea, and other organizations do not recognize the Bermuda Triangle as a unique or mysterious geographic hazard. They emphasize that this is a highly traveled area where the losses are consistent with natural phenomena such as strong storms, the Gulf Stream, human error, and poor navigation, rather than any mysterious forces.

Considering all this, the number of disappearances and accidents is what you’d expect. The Bermuda Triangle isn’t any more mysterious than the Greenland square, the New Zeeland circle, or the Azores Octagon, that I just made up. I consider this a super fact because it is very likely true, and yet surprising to many people who are convinced that there really is a mystery. Furthermore, it is important because it is such a well-known myth.

The Bermuda triangle has one corner in Bermuda, one in Puerto Rico and one around Miami, Florida | The Bermuda Triangle the Big Non-Mystery
The Bermuda Triangle: It is approximately defined as a triangle Florida, Bermuda, and Puerto Rico. There is no exact definition. Alphaiosderivative work: -Majestic-, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Bermuda Triangle Mysteries

Just because the risk of disappearances of planes and ships is not higher in the Bermuda Triangle, does not mean that there aren’t mysterious disappearances and mysterious phenomenon occurring in the Bermuda Triangle. Some notable disappearances are USS Cyclops (1918), Flight 19 (1945), Star Tiger and Star Ariel (1948–1949), and the Witchcraft (1967). However, there are mysteries and mysterious phenomena occurring all around the world.

One of the mysterious phenomena occurring in the Bermuda Triangle is ocean swirls, and rogue waves, and methane burps might be another problem, but it is far from unique to the Bermuda triangle, and there are no magnetic anomalies in the Bermuda triangle as often alleged.

Ocean swirls frequently occur all over the world with some famous hotspots for ocean swirls by the coasts of Japan, Norway, Italy, Scotland, and Maine, USA. The ocean swirls in the Bermuda triangle might be due to movement of water between landmasses and/or the Gulf stream, but this is under investigation. There are no known giant or permanent ocean swirls in the Bermuda triangle.

A giant deep ocean swirl in the middle of the blue ocean.
Ocean swirl allegedly in the Bermuda Triangle Asset id: 1158148882 by PHOTO JUNCTION

As mentioned, another mysterious phenomenon is methane bubbling to the surface of the ocean. However, as can be seen in the maps in this National Geographic blog post the source of these methane burps of death aren’t typical to the Bermuda triangle. The methane hydrate field in the first map of the National Geographic blog post is mostly outside of the Bermuda triangle stretching from Cuba and up along the Florida coast. The second map, the world map, shows that these methane hydrate fields exist all around the world.

Our Honeymoon in Bermuda

Below are some old photos from our honeymoon in Bermuda in August of 1991.

Thomas Wikman Super Facts
The Bermuda Triangle the Big Non-Mystery
The Bermuda Triangle the Big Non-Mystery
To see the other Super Facts click here