Transistors per Microchip Increased by More than 50 million Times in 50 Years

Superfact 127: The Intel 4004 processor chip created in 1971 had 2,308 transistors. Modern cutting-edge processors and AI accelerators exceed 50 billion to over 200 billion transistors, which is 25 million to nearly 100 million times as many transistors per chip. This follows Moore’s law, which states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles roughly every two years, while the cost of computers drops. As a result, computer chips have gotten millions of times faster and the cost of memory (RAM) has dropped by four trillion times. This has made the modern AI / LLM possible.

It is a modern CPU on a white background.
CPU (a processor or a central processing unit). Concept of technological advancement. Shutterstock asset id: 2760284753 by pisanstock

The transistor below is a large transistor that you can hold between your fingers. Transistors inside a computer chip are very small. They are microscopic. In the diagram, whenever a small voltage ( typically 0.7 volts) is applied to the base (B) it allows a much larger current to flow through the main terminals from the collector (C) to the emitter (E). Since electrons are negative this means that the electrons are flowing from the emitter to the collector. If there is no voltage or current at the base there is no current flowing from the collector to the emitter either. This is how you control the transistor and achieve more complex behavior if you have many connected transistors. Also, note that the transistor is a one way street.

A large black transistor with its diagram. The diagram includes the base and the emitter and collector.
A large NPN-BJP transistor with its symbol diagram on the right. Shutterstock asset id: 2169223279 by Surkhab Ahmad Art

Moore’s law, which states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles roughly every two years, is not a physical law, it is a purely observational law that has held for well over half a century. It is just a reflection of how good we are at improving processors. No one knows whether Moore’s law will continue to hold but if it does, then today’s computers and today’s AI are very bad compared to tomorrows computers and AI, and they are super bad compared to what we will have 20 years from now.

The diagram below shows 100+ microprocessors (CPUs), their number of processors, and the year they were introduced going from 1970 to 2020. The microprocessor data comes from this list. Intel 4004 is located in the lower left corner of the diagram and as mentioned it has 2,308 processors. The AMD Epyc Rome processor in the upper right corner has 39.54 billion processors. Notice that the number of processors is on a logarithmic scale (not 1,2,3,4,5….but 1,10,100,1000,10000, etc.) A curve that grows exponentially becomes like a line in such a diagram. This is another way of saying that the technological progress for microprocessors is exponential. Every six and a half years the number of transistors is 10-doubled.

The diagram feature 100+ CPU processors. Time of introduction is along the x-axis and the number of transistors on the y-axis.
Moore’s Law: The number of transistors on microchips has doubled every two years. Moore’s law describes the empirical regularity that the number of transistors on integrated circuits doubles approximately every two years. This advancement is important for other aspects of technological progress in computing – such as processor speed or the price of computers. Data source: Wikipedia (wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor_count). OurWorldData.org – Research and data to make progress against the world’s largest problem. Licensed under CC-BY by the authors Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser.

However, the processor that currently has the most transistors is the Cerebras Wafer Scale Engine 3 (WSE-3) with 4 trillion transistors. It is not in the diagram. A comparison between Intel 4004 and Cerebras Wafer Scale Engine 3 (WSE-3) may not be entirely fair since it is a wafer sized CPU specifically made for AI and much bigger than Intel 4004. However, the standard consumer or workstation CPU with currently the most transistors is Apple’s M3 Ultra (normal sized) with 184 billion transistors. However, 184 billion transistors that is more than 79 million times as many transistors as the Intel 4004.

A logarithmic scale from 1000 to 10 billion or 100 billion and over a time scale from 1971 to 2021. The graph showing the number of transistors is nearly linear.
Moore’s law: The number of transistors per microprocessor. Data source: Karl Rupp, Microprocessor Trend Data (2022) CC BY

This is a super fact because it is an important fact that is a surprise to you if you did not know about Moore’s law and mind-blowing even if you did.

Computational Capacity / Speed

One benefit of transistors and other electronic components becoming much smaller is increased speed. The graph below shows that the fastest supercomputers in 1993 had a processing speed of 124 Gigaflops and in 2025 a processing speed of 1.81 billion Gigaflops, which is 14.6 million times faster. One gigaflop equals one billion floating-point operations per second. Multiplying 3.1415926536 times 2.7182818284 = 8.5397342225 is an example of a floating point operation. Note that 1.81 billion Gigaflops is 1.81 quintillion floating-point operations per second.

The left axis in the diagram is logarithmic going from 100 gigaflops to well over a billion gigaflops. The x-axis corresponds to the years going from 1993 to 2025.
Computational capacity of the fastest supercomputers. Number of floating-point operations carried out per second by the fastest supercomputer in any given year. This is expressed in gigaflops, equivalent to one billion floating-point operations per second. Data source: Dongarra et al. (2025) OurWorldinData/technological-change | CC BY

Cost of Memory

Much smaller and faster and transistors and other kinds of electronic components also come with additional benefits such as an extreme reduction in the price of memory, including the extreme reduction in the price of random access memory, RAM. In the diagram below (taken from this page ) the blue line shows that the price for one Terabyte of memory (RAM) in 1957 was 3,79 quadrillion dollars and now in 2023 it is only 1,088 dollars. 3,79 quadrillion dollars is a lot of money.

You may object that and point out that 3,79 quadrillion dollars is even more than our national deficit. So how can that be possible? The answer is that one terabyte of memory did not exist in 1957. 3,79 quadrillion dollars per terabyte is the same as 3.79 million dollars per kilobyte, but those are the numbers that make sense for 1957. The gigantic computers back then only had a few kilobytes of memory. You just need to do the conversion. Anyway, 3,79 quadrillion dollars versus 1,088 dollars corresponds to a reduction in price by 3,48 trillion times. For disk memory the price per terabyte went down from 87.5 billion in 1956 to 11 dollars in 2023, a reduction of 7.95 billion times.

The blue graph corresponds to random access memory RAM and is most of the time the most expensive. The brown graph is disk memory. The red graph is flash memory, and the green line is solid state memory. All graphs show a huge reduction in price over time.
Historical price of computer memory and storage. This data is expressed in US dollars per terabyte (TB), adjusted for inflation. “Memory” refers to random access memory (RAM), “disk” to magnetic storage, “flash” to special memory used for rapid data access and rewriting, and “solid state to solid-state” drives (SSDs). Data source: John C. McCallum (2023); U.S. bureau of Labor Statistics (2026). Note: For each year, the time series shows the cheapest historical price recorded until that year. This data is expressed in constant 2020 US$. OurWorldinData.org/technological-change | CC BY

Increased Computational Power and Artificial Intelligence

My super fact 88 states that “Artificial Intelligence is Not New” It goes back to at least 1943 with the creation of the first artificial neural network model, the first trainable (able to learn) neural network in 1957, and the foundation of the field of “Artificial Intelligence Research” in 1956. In 1986 a landmark paper was published by David Rumelhart, Geoffrey Hinton, and Ronald Williams which introduced the Rumelhart backpropagation algorithm, which is used today by modern AI and Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT. Geoffrey Hinton, who is said to be the father of Artificial Intelligence, received the Nobel Prize in physics in 2024. David Rumelhart and Ronald Williams were both dead and could therefore not receive the Nobel Prize.

So why did it take so long for today’s commercial LLMs to appear? The answer is, for the most part, that the computational power and huge memory required did not exist until recently. Sure, training these large AI systems require enormous amounts of data that comes from outside of the processors (internet) but you need enormous amounts of memory to store this data and an enormous computational processing power to run the algorithms such as Rumelhart’s backpropagation algorithm. For example, ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 feature 96 versus 120 hidden layers of neurons with hundreds of billions and trillions of parameters/neurons in total. The enormous increase in computer processing power and memory is an essential aspect of scaling up AI. Our World in Data has an article about this here.

The diagram shows a deep learning neural network featuring hidden layers, a couple of input/output layers, and large computer.
The dots in the diagram are neurons. With permission from kwholley63

Conclusion

Moore’s law, a purely observational law, states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles roughly every two years. This also means that the computational processing power of processors has greatly increased and the cost of memory has dropped by a lot. This in turn has made the existence of modern Large Language Models such as ChatGPT possible.

Transistors per Microchip Increased by More than 50 million Times in 50 Years. Processing speed has increased 14.6 million times in 32 years. The reduction in price per Tera Byte has gone down 3,48 trillion times in 67 years.

If Moore’s law holds, we can expect that in twenty years the number of transistors per Microchip will increase by more than 1,000 times, that processing speed will increase roughly 29,000 times, and that memory RAM will be more than 6,000 times cheaper. These are my calculations based on the graphs above.




To see the other Super Facts click here

Unknown's avatar

Author: thomasstigwikman

My name is Thomas Wikman. I am a software/robotics engineer with a background in physics. I am currently retired. I took early retirement. I am a dog lover, and especially a Leonberger lover, a home brewer, craft beer enthusiast, I’m learning French, and I am an avid reader. I live in Dallas, Texas, but I am originally from Sweden. I am married to Claudia, and we have three children. I have two blogs. The first feature the crazy adventures of our Leonberger Le Bronco von der Löwenhöhle as well as information on Leonbergers. The second blog, superfactful, feature information and facts I think are very interesting. With this blog I would like to create a list of facts that are accepted as true among the experts of the field and yet disputed amongst the public or highly surprising. These facts are special and in lieu of a better word I call them super-facts.

25 thoughts on “Transistors per Microchip Increased by More than 50 million Times in 50 Years”

  1. This post is interesting, Thomas, as is moore’s law which makes theoretical sense. However, this post only comments on the economic value assigned by humans to the R&D behind the development of AI. It does not discuss whether the planet can sustain the huge demand for limited resources like water that the AI computers require. If the need for these resources reduces with further R&D, then AI will advance. If it does not, we risk bankrupting our planet of necessary natural resources which may impact our survival as a species. Further, if AI continues to advance, I can’t see why humans will remain relevant and we may become extinct as an unviable species.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes you are right Robbie, this post does not discuss environmental impacts or “whether the planet can sustain the huge demand for limited resources like water”. That is another big topic for another time. It is a big topic here in Texas right now where water resources are becoming increasingly scarce. In yesterday’s Dallas Morning News a whole bunch of people wrote letters to the editor about data centers including one from a friend of mine, Andrea Christgau. You can read it and other people’s letters here.

      Like

  2. That is pretty cool and wild if you think about where it will go. 2 years ago, nobody thought this, or very few did, and it wasn’t mainstream. It is hard to imagine where this is going, but it is pretty cool what we can do with technology today. Thanks for the shout-out on the photo.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much Kevin. It is amazing progress that still seems to be going. It will be interesting and maybe scary to see where this will go. Thank you so much for letting me use your picture. I know it was a while ago since I asked you. If you don’t mind I would like to use it again in a future post.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Mind‑blowing, Thomas. The scale of change is hard to wrap my head around, but you explain it in a way that makes it feel clear instead of overwhelming. It’s astonishing how far we’ve come in such a short time.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes I agree Kymber. Even though I knew about this and Moore’s law several decades ago it still blows my mind. Our technological progress in this area has indeed been exponential and it still is. Most new technolgies eventually peeter out. This is still going. I very much appreciate your kind words.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Wow I guess that is an antique by now. I should say that when I was working at Ericsson I was designing the electronics for a Swedish military aeroplane (JAS Gripen 39). Everything we did back then was already integrated circuits, but we still had the transistors you could hold in your hand and we used them for decoration.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Talk about a good expample of the word exponential, you’ve done it, Thomas. My computer is much faster than my former computer, which was about 5 years old. Unfortunately, it has so many glitches coming up all the time, I can’t wait for the next one. I spend hours with ChatGPT problem solving why my apps and programs don’t work correctly. So, maybe speed isn’t everything.

    Like

Leave a comment