Superfact 127: The Intel 4004 processor chip created in 1971 had 2,308 transistors. Modern cutting-edge processors and AI accelerators exceed 50 billion to over 200 billion transistors, which is 25 million to nearly 100 million times as many transistors per chip. This follows Moore’s law, which states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles roughly every two years, while the cost of computers drops. As a result, computer chips have gotten millions of times faster and the cost of memory (RAM) has dropped by four trillion times. This has made the modern AI / LLM possible.

The transistor below is a large transistor that you can hold between your fingers. Transistors inside a computer chip are very small. They are microscopic. In the diagram, whenever a small voltage ( typically 0.7 volts) is applied to the base (B) it allows a much larger current to flow through the main terminals from the collector (C) to the emitter (E). Since electrons are negative this means that the electrons are flowing from the emitter to the collector. If there is no voltage or current at the base there is no current flowing from the collector to the emitter either. This is how you control the transistor and achieve more complex behavior if you have many connected transistors. Also, note that the transistor is a one way street.

Moore’s law, which states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles roughly every two years, is not a physical law, it is a purely observational law that has held for well over half a century. It is just a reflection of how good we are at improving processors. No one knows whether Moore’s law will continue to hold but if it does, then today’s computers and today’s AI are very bad compared to tomorrows computers and AI, and they are super bad compared to what we will have 20 years from now.
The diagram below shows 100+ microprocessors (CPUs), their number of processors, and the year they were introduced going from 1970 to 2020. The microprocessor data comes from this list. Intel 4004 is located in the lower left corner of the diagram and as mentioned it has 2,308 transistors. The AMD Epyc Rome processor in the upper right corner has 39.54 billion processors. Notice that the number of processors is on a logarithmic scale (not 1,2,3,4,5….but 1,10,100,1000,10000, etc.) A curve that grows exponentially becomes like a line in such a diagram. This is another way of saying that the technological progress for microprocessors is exponential. Every six and a half years the number of transistors is 10-doubled.

However, the processor that currently has the most transistors is the Cerebras Wafer Scale Engine 3 (WSE-3) with 4 trillion transistors. It is not in the diagram. A comparison between Intel 4004 and Cerebras Wafer Scale Engine 3 (WSE-3) may not be entirely fair since it is a wafer sized CPU specifically made for AI and much bigger than Intel 4004. However, the standard consumer or workstation CPU with currently the most transistors is Apple’s M3 Ultra (normal sized) with 184 billion transistors. However, 184 billion transistors that is more than 79 million times as many transistors as the Intel 4004.

This is a super fact because it is an important fact that is a surprise to you if you did not know about Moore’s law and mind-blowing even if you did.
Computational Capacity / Speed
One benefit of transistors and other electronic components becoming much smaller is increased speed. The graph below shows that the fastest supercomputers in 1993 had a processing speed of 124 Gigaflops and in 2025 a processing speed of 1.81 billion Gigaflops, which is 14.6 million times faster. One gigaflop equals one billion floating-point operations per second. Multiplying 3.1415926536 times 2.7182818284 = 8.5397342225 is an example of a floating point operation. Note that 1.81 billion Gigaflops is 1.81 quintillion floating-point operations per second.

Cost of Memory
Much smaller and faster and transistors and other kinds of electronic components also come with additional benefits such as an extreme reduction in the price of memory, including the extreme reduction in the price of random access memory, RAM. In the diagram below (taken from this page ) the blue line shows that the price for one Terabyte of memory (RAM) in 1957 was 3,79 quadrillion dollars and now in 2023 it is only 1,088 dollars. 3,79 quadrillion dollars is a lot of money.
You may object that and point out that 3,79 quadrillion dollars is even more than our national deficit. So how can that be possible? The answer is that one terabyte of memory did not exist in 1957. 3,79 quadrillion dollars per terabyte is the same as 3.79 million dollars per kilobyte, but those are the numbers that make sense for 1957. The gigantic computers back then only had a few kilobytes of memory. You just need to do the conversion. Anyway, 3,79 quadrillion dollars versus 1,088 dollars corresponds to a reduction in price by 3,48 trillion times. For disk memory the price per terabyte went down from 87.5 billion in 1956 to 11 dollars in 2023, a reduction of 7.95 billion times.

Increased Computational Power and Artificial Intelligence
My super fact 88 states that “Artificial Intelligence is Not New” It goes back to at least 1943 with the creation of the first artificial neural network model, the first trainable (able to learn) neural network in 1957, and the foundation of the field of “Artificial Intelligence Research” in 1956. In 1986 a landmark paper was published by David Rumelhart, Geoffrey Hinton, and Ronald Williams which introduced the Rumelhart backpropagation algorithm, which is used today by modern AI and Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT. Geoffrey Hinton, who is said to be the father of Artificial Intelligence, received the Nobel Prize in physics in 2024. David Rumelhart and Ronald Williams were both dead and could therefore not receive the Nobel Prize.
So why did it take so long for today’s commercial LLMs to appear? The answer is, for the most part, that the computational power and huge memory required did not exist until recently. Sure, training these large AI systems require enormous amounts of data that comes from outside of the processors (internet) but you need enormous amounts of memory to store this data and an enormous computational processing power to run the algorithms such as Rumelhart’s backpropagation algorithm. For example, ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 feature 96 versus 120 hidden layers of neurons with hundreds of billions and trillions of parameters/neurons in total. The enormous increase in computer processing power and memory is an essential aspect of scaling up AI. Our World in Data has an article about this here.

Conclusion
Moore’s law, a purely observational law, states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles roughly every two years. This also means that the computational processing power of processors has greatly increased and the cost of memory has dropped by a lot. This in turn has made the existence of modern Large Language Models such as ChatGPT possible.
Transistors per Microchip Increased by More than 50 million Times in 50 Years. Processing speed has increased 14.6 million times in 32 years. The reduction in price per Tera Byte has gone down 3,48 trillion times in 67 years.
If Moore’s law holds, we can expect that in twenty years the number of transistors per Microchip will increase by more than 1,000 times, that processing speed will increase roughly 29,000 times, and that memory RAM will be more than 6,000 times cheaper. These are my calculations based on the graphs above.
Thank you for your insights. I always enjoy have my knowledge expanded by reading your posts, Thomas.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Esther. You are very kind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, and wow, is all I can say!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Chris. I agree. I’ve known this for many decades but it never stops blowing my mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This post is interesting, Thomas, as is moore’s law which makes theoretical sense. However, this post only comments on the economic value assigned by humans to the R&D behind the development of AI. It does not discuss whether the planet can sustain the huge demand for limited resources like water that the AI computers require. If the need for these resources reduces with further R&D, then AI will advance. If it does not, we risk bankrupting our planet of necessary natural resources which may impact our survival as a species. Further, if AI continues to advance, I can’t see why humans will remain relevant and we may become extinct as an unviable species.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes you are right Robbie, this post does not discuss environmental impacts or “whether the planet can sustain the huge demand for limited resources like water”. That is another big topic for another time. It is a big topic here in Texas right now where water resources are becoming increasingly scarce. In yesterday’s Dallas Morning News a whole bunch of people wrote letters to the editor about data centers including one from a friend of mine, Andrea Christgau. You can read it and other people’s letters here.
LikeLike
Thank you for this link, Thomas. I look forward to reading your thoughts on the water issue 😉
LikeLike
That’s miraculous. Thank you for sharing this interesting information.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes it is amazing progress. Thank you so much Kaushal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is pretty cool and wild if you think about where it will go. 2 years ago, nobody thought this, or very few did, and it wasn’t mainstream. It is hard to imagine where this is going, but it is pretty cool what we can do with technology today. Thanks for the shout-out on the photo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Kevin. It is amazing progress that still seems to be going. It will be interesting and maybe scary to see where this will go. Thank you so much for letting me use your picture. I know it was a while ago since I asked you. If you don’t mind I would like to use it again in a future post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mind‑blowing, Thomas. The scale of change is hard to wrap my head around, but you explain it in a way that makes it feel clear instead of overwhelming. It’s astonishing how far we’ve come in such a short time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I agree Kymber. Even though I knew about this and Moore’s law several decades ago it still blows my mind. Our technological progress in this area has indeed been exponential and it still is. Most new technolgies eventually peeter out. This is still going. I very much appreciate your kind words.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think my brain needs more transistors or something to absorb all this info.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anneli, I need more transistors too. I started out thinking this would be a post with 600-700 but it ended up being almost 1600 words. It is difficult to keep technology posts short.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I absorb what I can. And thanks for your huge efforts to make us more informed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much for your kind words Anneli
LikeLiked by 1 person
I still have my transistor from the 60’s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow I guess that is an antique by now. I should say that when I was working at Ericsson I was designing the electronics for a Swedish military aeroplane (JAS Gripen 39). Everything we did back then was already integrated circuits, but we still had the transistors you could hold in your hand and we used them for decoration.
LikeLiked by 1 person
With that transistor, I heard the Beatles on the radio for the first time! Dang, I’m old! 😄
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is interesting. I’ve read that the classical transistor radio had six transistors in them and back then transistors were big enough to hold in your hand. But now they are microscopic and come in millions and billions per device. Time flies.
LikeLike
Talk about a good expample of the word exponential, you’ve done it, Thomas. My computer is much faster than my former computer, which was about 5 years old. Unfortunately, it has so many glitches coming up all the time, I can’t wait for the next one. I spend hours with ChatGPT problem solving why my apps and programs don’t work correctly. So, maybe speed isn’t everything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Marsha. You are right of course. Speed is not everything. It also has to work properly and you have to have good algorithms for solving problems. I hope you’ll get your computer issues solved.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope so too, Thomas. I’ve spent days getting Google to act right. Lightroom is still a mess. I have different browsers setting and resetting themselves as the default browser. But I’m sure my CPU is super fast!
LikeLike
The Intel 4004 had 2,308 processors is incorrect. It had 2,308 transistors.!
LikeLiked by 1 person
whisperer2darkness yes of course, thank you for catching the typo. I fixed it now.
LikeLike
Wow, no wonder everything is replaced so fast.. the joys and hazards of technology, Thomas. Steadfast work here.❣️
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Cindy. Yes you are right, it is moving fast, and it is both joys and hazards.
LikeLike