Tag: Blogging

Electrons Have Spin Without Spinning

Super fact 97 : Things that spin have an angular momentum and if electrically charged they also generate a magnetic field (magnetic dipole). This is true for electrons and many other elementary particles. However, electrons are not physically spinning. This “spin” is an intrinsic property like electrical charge or mass. In addition, the electron has “Spin 1/2,” meaning you must rotate its wave function 720 degrees (two full circles) to get back to where you started. Moreover, this half spin oddity makes the existence of matter possible.

The picture shows a red ball representing a particle with +1/2 spin and a blue particle with -1/2 spin. The red spinning ball creates a magnetic dipole with the north pointing up and the south down. The spinning blue ball does the opposite. | Electrons Have Spin Without Spinning
The electron behaves as if it were spinning about an axis, thereby generating a magnetic field whose direction depends on the direction of spin. Shutterstock asset id: 1945241416 by Fouad A. Saad.

An electron with spin +1/2 will align parallel with an external magnetic field while an electron with spin -1/2 will align in the opposite direction. The existence of intrinsic spin and the fact that the half spin property requires you to rotate the electron’s wave function twice to get back to where you started is very surprising. Particles with half spin (electrons, protons, positrons, muons, etc.) are called Fermions. It is also surprising that the half spin property makes the existence of matter possible. These true but surprising facts are important, which is why I consider this a super fact.

Angular Momentum and Magnetic Dipoles

On the left the illustration shows a man sitting on a rotating chair with his hands stretched out. In his hands he is holding dumbbells. The right side of the illustration depicts him bringing his hands close to his body resulting in the rotation speeding up. This is an example of the law of conservation of angular momentum.
The law of conservation of angular momentum. Shutterstock asset id: 1669028755 by DKN0049

The picture above gives an example of the law of conservation of angular momentum. Bringing weights closer to the body speeds up the rotation. Another example of the law of conservation of angular momentum is when you try to tip the axis of the rotation. This would be the man tipping over. You can’t do that without applying a force. The electron, and other subatomic particles with spin, display this gyroscopic effect, like a spinning top. As mentioned, charged particles such as the electron, positron or proton, also generate a magnetic field as if they were spinning. However, the strange fact is that despite that electrons and other particles with spin display these spin properties, they aren’t spinning.

Below is an overview of the elementary particles. An elementary particle is a fundamental subatomic building block of the universe that cannot be divided into smaller components. Notice that the proton and the neutron are not listed because they are not fundamental particles. They consist of three quarks. The top number is the mass (0.511 MeV/c2 for an electron). The number below that is the charge (-1 for an electron) and the bottom number is spin (1/2 for an electron). The diagram shows three intrinsic properties per particle.

This is periodic table style map showing the six quarks, six leptons and five bosons. | Electrons Have Spin Without Spinning
Elementary particles of the Standard Model from Wikipedia By Cush – Own work using:PBS NOVA [1], Fermilab, Office of Science, United States Department of Energy, Particle Data Group, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=4286964

Electron Orbitals

I should explain something about particles and waves. Subatomic particles are associated with quantum waves. This is quantum mechanics. For example, an electron is in a sense both a particle and a wave, or more correctly neither. However, it exhibits both point like particle characteristics and wave characteristics depending on circumstances. Below is a picture showing the standing quantum waves representing an electron in different orbitals (different states) in a Hydrogen atom.

Hydrogen atoms only have one electron, but that electron can exist in different orbitals (sort of different orbits). A standing wave is a wave that is not spreading out, like the waves going back and forth in a bathtub. You can’t really say that the electron is orbiting the nucleus like a planet. The standing quantum wave, or electron cloud, or orbital are more accurate ways to view it.

The standing quantum waves look like spheres, or ellipses, or drops, all kinds of strange shapes.
Hydrogen electron orbitals, the electron’s charge distribution around the atom’s nucleus, quantum mechanics, Orbital shell, atomic orbital, electron cloud or wave mechanics model. Shutterstock asset id: 2500396483 by Watthana Tirahimonchan.

There is some confusion as to what the standing quantum waves represent. The Copenhagen interpretation says that the electron exists in superposition, or all possible states, until measured. The quantum wave indicates the probability that you will find the electron in a certain place when you measure. The square of the amplitude of the wave is the probability that you will find the electron at that point. When you measure it and find out where the electron is the wave will collapse.

Other interpretations say that the electron is in a specific place, you just don’t know where, but again the square of the amplitude of the wave is the probability that you will find the electron at that point. Yet other interpretations say that the quantum wave is a real physical thing that guides the electron (pilot waves). The so called many-worlds-interpretation say that all possible outcomes of a measurement happens but in an infinite number of parallel universes (multi-verses).

Then some people say that the quantum wave does not exist at all, other than as a probability distribution. It represents what the observer knows about the system, nothing else. If you don’t know where the electron is, then the wave is all over the place. If you measure where it is then the wave collapses. Then we also have the you-don’t-know-what-you-are-talking-about-just-shut-up-and-calculate interpretation. The latter interpretation is focused on using the equations, for example the Schrödinger and Dirac equations, to make predictions and measurements and it ignores what’s behind the scenes. This interpretation is popular in college physics classes.

Whichever interpretation you prefer, the you-must-fully-rotate-the-wave-function-twice-to-get-back-to-start property leads to the Pauli exclusion principle.

The Pauli Exclusion Principle

The Pauli exclusion principle states that two identical fermions (such as electrons) cannot occupy the same quantum state simultaneously. For example, two electrons in the same orbital must have opposite spin +1/2 and -1/2 and you could never add a third electron. This adds structure to the atom and to the nucleus. If you did not have the Pauli exclusion principle everything could just fall into one point, and you could walk through walls. Matter as we know it could not exist. This is why fermions (electrons, muons, positrons, quarks, protons, neutrons, etc.) often are referred to as matter particles and bosons (photons, gluons, etc.) are referred to as radiation.

It turns out that that the Pauli exclusion principle is a direct result of the half spin of fermions, in other words, that you have to rotate the associated wave twice around to get back to the original.

Do you think this is confusing ? Don’t feel bad. Richard Feyman one of the most prominent pioneers of quantum mechanics and Nobel Prize winner in physics said, “I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics”.

Other Super Facts Related to Modern Physics

To see the other Super Facts click here

Nuclear Energy is Relatively Clean and Safe

Superfact 96: Nuclear power is a relatively clean and safe energy source that produces no atmospheric emissions during operation. However, there are some problems with nuclear power, but they are often overblown.

The photo shows the three mile island nuclear plant from the across the shore of Susquehanna River in Londonderry Township.
The Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant south of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. March 28, 1979, a nuclear accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant sent shockwaves across the world, raising fears about nuclear power. However, no one died, and no one was hurt. Shutterstock Asset id: 2512612545 by Aubrie K

Clean energy sources are often defamed by disinformation and misunderstandings. For example, wind power turbines are not bird killing machines. Contrary to what you often hear wind power is indeed a very clean, cheap and sustainable energy source. Nuclear power is another misunderstood energy source. Wind power, solar power, hydro, and nuclear power are all considered clean energy because they produce no greenhouse gases or air pollution during operation and they also have very low life-cycle emissions.

The graph below from Our World in Data depicting lifetime greenhouse gas emissions (construction, operation, disposal) and safety data for the European Union, show that the lifetime greenhouse gas emissions of coal power is 162 times higher than those of nuclear power and coal kill 820 times as many people as nuclear power. The lifetime greenhouse gas emissions of natural gas are 120 times higher than those of nuclear power and kill 613 times as many people as nuclear power. The difference is staggering.

The graph depicts death rates and greenhouse gas emissions per unit for different energy sources including coal, oil, natural gas, biomass, hydropower, wind, nuclear power, and solar. | Nuclear Energy is Relatively Clean and Safe
Death rates from fossil fuels and biomass are based on state-of-the art plants with pollution control in Europe and are based on older models of the impacts of air pollution on health. This means that these death rates are likely to be very conservative. For further discussion see our article: OurWorldinData.org/safest-sources-of-energy. Electricity shares are given for 2021. Data sources: Markandya & Wilkinson (2007); UNSCEAR (2008: 2018); Sovacol et al. (2016); IPCC AR5 (2014); UNECE (2022); Ember Energy (2001). OurWorldinData.org – Research and data to make progress against the world’s largest problems. Licensed under CC-BY by the authors Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser. Citation : Hannah Ritchie (2020) – “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?” Published online at OurWorldinData.org. Retrieved from: ‘https://archive.ourworldindata.org/20260202-100556/safest-sources-of-energy.html’ [Online Resource] (archived on February 2, 2026).

In the graph above, greenhouse gas emissions are measured of CO2 equivalents per Gigawatt-hour of electricity over the lifecycle of the power plant. 1 Gigawatt-hour is the annual electricity consumption of 150 people in the EU. Death rate from accidents and air pollution is measured as deaths per Terawatt hour of electricity production. 1 terawatt hour is the annual electricity consumption of 150,000 people in the EU.

I should mention that there are problems with nuclear power that are not entirely covered by the graph above, including radioactive waste, a history of spectacular accidents, and a perceived connection to nuclear arms. However, as you will see later in this post, even though these problems get a lot of media attention, they are not as scary as one might think. However, it should be noted that nuclear power in its current form is not a cheap source of energy, but that is a different topic.

I consider this a super fact because nuclear power is often thought of as an extremely dangerous and dirty source of energy, which is not the case.

How Does Nuclear Power Work ?

From left to right : a neutron strikes a uranium nucleus, and it breaks apart into a Krypton and Barium isotope and release three neutrons, which strike three uranium nucleuses, causing three fission events and releasing nine neutrons in total, etc.
Illustration of nuclear chain reaction. Uranium-235 fission. Shutterstock asset id: 73714504 by Mpanchenko. Note I corrected an error in the picture.

The fuel (fuel rods) in a nuclear power station consists primarily of stacked ceramic pellets made of low enriched uranium dioxide housed inside sealed metal tubes. The uranium consists primarily of two uranium isotopes U-238, which has 92 protons and 146 neutrons and U-235, which has 92 protons and 143 neutrons. Uranium always has 92 protons. The isotope that is used for fission is U-235. Natural Uranium consists of 0.7% U-235, trace amounts of U-236 and the rest (99.3%) is U-238. The uranium in nuclear fuel rods is either natural (0.7% U-235) or a few percent of U-235 (low enriched uranium). This should be contrasted with a uranium atomic bomb which has at least 80% U-235 (highly enriched).

A nuclear power plant generates electricity using heat from nuclear reactions. Inside the reactor, atoms of fuel (uranium) undergo nuclear fission, where they split apart and release a large amount of heat. The fuel rods (see picture below) in a nuclear power station consist primarily of stacked ceramic pellets made of low enriched uranium dioxide housed inside sealed metal tubes. There are also control rods in a nuclear power station, which consist of materials with a high neutron absorption cross-section. The control rods are used to regulate the reaction. If they are fully inserted the reaction will stop. Also note that nuclear reactors have a containment shield (at least in western countries).

How a nuclear reactor generates electricity using fuel rods, control rods, steam, turbines, and generators diagram hand drawn schematic vector.
Fission generates heat, which generates high pressure steam, which pushes a turbine around, which turns a generator, which generates electricity, which is transformed to the right voltage and delivered to customers. Science educational illustration Shutterstock Asset id: 2658971563 by Alexander_P

Below is an alternative illustration.

Fission generates heat, which generates high pressure steam, which pushes a turbine around, which turns a generator, which generates electricity, which is transformed to the right voltage and delivered to customers. The picture also shows a cooling tower and illustrates how a nuclear plant uses water.
A nuclear power plant generates electricity by using heat from nuclear fission to produce steam, which drives turbines connected to electrical generators. This illustration also depicts the nuclear power plant’s use of water for cooling. Don’t worry, the water will not turn radioactive. It is a separate isolated loop. Shutterstock Asset id: 2525528665 by Papia Majumder.
The photo is taken in 2024 and shows the Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant with a nuclear reactor building and the associated coolant tower. | Nuclear Energy is Relatively Clean and Safe
Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant, located in Pennsylvania, is known for a partial meltdown in 1979 Shutterstock. This photo shows the reactor as well as the cooling tower. Asset id: 2520903273 by Amy Lutz.

What about Chernobyl ?

The Chernobyl disaster, which occurred on April 26, 1986, was the worst nuclear disaster in history. 50 people died as a direct result of the disaster and an estimated 4,000, perhaps 10,000 future cancer deaths are predicted from the disaster. However, it should be noted that an estimated half million people died from coal pollution in the United States over the first two decades of the 21st century. You have to compare.

Another, thing to keep in mind is that the Chernobyl reactors were RBMK reactors (Reaktor Bolshoy Moshchnosti Kanalnyy), an extremely flawed, old and dangerous design that only exists in Russia (or the former Soviet Union). Above I mentioned that the control rods slow down the nuclear reaction when inserted between the fuel rods and stop the reaction when fully inserted. In an RBMK reactor, it is the other way around. The control rods speed up the reaction when inserted. Add the fact that the Chernobyl reactor did not have a containment shield designed to contain a major release of radioactivity, unlike Western reactors and that the Soviet Union was an authoritarian and secretive regime that made things much worse. A nuclear disaster similar to Chernobyl is highly unlikely to happen in the West.

The Fukushima nuclear disaster was caused by a severe earthquake and a 15 meter tsunami. Around 2,300 died from the evacuation, and 15,000 people died from the Earthquake, but it is estimated that no one, or perhaps one person died as a direct result from the nuclear disaster itself. As mentioned no one died from the Three Mile Island accident.

What about Radioactive Waste?

Radioactive waste stored on-site at nuclear power stations (spent fuel) is often millions of times more radioactive than long-term disposal waste. It is important to remember that highly radioactive isotopes decay fast (that’s why they are dangerous), which means that long-term disposal waste is not very dangerous. We are surrounded by radioactivity and our by far largest exposure to ionizing radiation comes from the radon in our basements.

Does nuclear power for energy generation increase the risk for nuclear weapons proliferation?

While commercial nuclear energy and weapons programs share technology, they are distinct processes. The historical data and studies show that national nuclear energy programs in general don’t lead to the development of nuclear weapons. No country officially developed nuclear weapons based on a pre-existing commercial nuclear power industry. Typically, nuclear-armed nations developed dedicated, military-focused, and often secret reactors to produce plutonium or facilities to enrich uranium for weapons.  Also, the issue is mostly moot for countries that already have nuclear weapons, such as the United States.

Conclusion

Nuclear power is clean and safe. It might be our cleanest energy source that can provide baseload power. However, there are other concerns including the possibility of spectacular accidents, radioactive waste and the possibility that nuclear power for energy might aid nuclear weapons proliferation. Luckily, it appears that these concerns are overblown. It should be noted that nuclear power, as implemented today, is not cheap energy, but that is a different topic.

To see the Other Super Facts click here

Is Plant Intelligence Real?

The goal of this blog is to create a list of what I call super facts. Super facts are important and true facts that nevertheless are very surprising to many, misunderstood, or disputed among the public. They are special facts that we all can learn something important from. However, I also make posts that are not super facts but feature other interesting information, such as this book review and book recommendation.

The Light Eaters: How the Unseen World of Plant Intelligence Offers a New Understanding of Life on Earth by Zoë Schlanger – May 7, 2024

Below I am listing the four versions of this book. I bought the hardback version.

  • Hardback –  Publisher : Harper (May 7, 2024), ISBN-10 : 0063073854, ISBN-13 : 978-0063073852, 304 pages, item weight : 2.31 pounds, dimensions : 6 x 0.92 x 9 inches. It costs $ 19.90 on US Amazon. Click here to order it from Amazon.com.
  • Paperback –  Publisher : Harper Perennial (May 13, 2025), ISBN-10 : 0063073862, ISBN-13 : 978-0063073869, 304 pages, item weight : 11.2 ounces, dimensions : 5.5 x 0.75 x 8 inches. It costs $15.99 on US Amazon. Click here to order it from Amazon.com.
  • Kindle –  Publisher : Harper (May 7, 2024), ASIN : B0CFM4SMPF, 298 pages, it costs $ 14.99on US Amazon. Click here to order it from Amazon.com.
  • • Audiobook – Publisher : Harper (May 7, 2024), ASIN : B0CJWQ6X99, Listening length : 10 hours and 56 minutes. Click here to order it from Amazon.com.
The front cover features a plant on a black background, the title and author of the book and the phrase “How the Unseen World of Plant Intelligence Offers a New Understanding of Life on Earth”. | The front cover of The Light Eaters: How the Unseen World of Plant Intelligence Offers a New Understanding of Life on Earth by Zoë Schlanger.
The front cover of The Light Eaters: How the Unseen World of Plant Intelligence Offers a New Understanding of Life on Earth by Zoë Schlanger. Click on the image to go to the Amazon page for the hardback version of the book.

Amazon’s Description of the Book

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER

The New Yorker’s Best Books of 2024 • TIME’s 10 Best Nonfiction Books of 2024 • New York Magazine’s 10 Best Books of the Year • Washington Post’s 50 Notable Works of Nonfiction of 2024 • Smithsonian’s 10 Best Science Books of the Year •  A Best Book of the Year: Boston Globe, Scientific American,New York Public Library, Christian Science Monitor, Library Journal, and Publishers Weekly • An Amazon Best Nonfiction Book of the Year

Longlisted for the National Book Critics Circle Nonfiction Prize • Finalist for the Chautauqua Prize • Finalist for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize • Winner of the National Outdoor Book Award for Natural History

“A masterpiece of science writing.” ―Robin Wall Kimmerer, author of Braiding Sweetgrass

“Mesmerizing, world-expanding, and achingly beautiful.” ―Ed Yong, author of An Immense World

“Rich, vital, and full of surprises. Read it!” ―Elizabeth Kolbert, author of Under a White Sky and The Sixth Extinction

Award-winning Atlantic staff writer Zoë Schlanger delivers a groundbreaking work of natural history and popular science that probes the hidden world of the plant kingdom, “destabilizing not just how we see the green things of the world but also our place in the hierarchy of beings, and maybe the notion of that hierarchy itself.” (The New Yorker)

It takes tremendous biological creativity to be a plant. To survive and thrive while rooted in a single spot, plants have adapted ingenious methods of survival. In recent years, scientists have learned about their ability to communicate, recognize their kin and behave socially, hear sounds, morph their bodies to blend into their surroundings, store useful memories that inform their life cycle, and trick animals into behaving to their benefit―a fascinating display of plant behavior and sensory abilities, to name just a few remarkable talents.

The Light Eaters is a deep immersion into the drama of green life and the complexity of this wild and awe-inspiring world that challenges our very understanding of agency, consciousness, and intelligence. In this captivating exploration of plant intelligence, we see that plants, rather than imitate human intelligence, have perhaps formed a parallel system. What is intelligent life if not a vine that grows leaves to blend into the shrub on which it climbs, a flower that shapes its bloom to fit exactly the beak of its pollinator, a pea seedling that can hear water flowing and make its way toward it? Zoë Schlanger takes us across the globe, digging into her own memories and into the soil with the scientists who have spent their waking days studying these amazing entities up close.

What can we learn about life on Earth from the living things that thrive, adapt, consume, and accommodate simultaneously? More important, what do we owe these life forms once we come to understand their rich and varied abilities? Examining the latest epiphanies in botanical research, Schlanger spotlights the intellectual struggles among the researchers conceiving a wholly new view of their subject, offering a glimpse of a field in turmoil as plant scientists debate the tenets of ongoing discoveries and how insights into plant communication influence our understanding of what a plant is.

We need plants to survive. But what do they need us for―if at all? An eye-opening and informative look at the ecosystem we live in, this book challenges us to rethink the role of plants―and our own place―in the natural world, tackling the enthralling question of plant consciousness along the way.

This is my five-star review for The Light Eaters

It is a truly great and fact filled book

Plant Behavior and Communication is Real. What about Plant Intelligence?

This is a very interesting book that describes the ways plants behave and communicate via chemicals, fungus, sound, electric signals and light. Many plants even exhibit memory functions and are able mimic the look of other plants from a distance. A leaf is the only thing in our known world that can manufacture sugar out of materials, light and air, that have never been alive. They can produce complex chemicals, like caffeine, that humans and animals can’t produce. If weighed, plants would amount to 80% of Earth’s living matter.

Plants can regrow virtually any amputated part. Some plants inject poisons into the ground around their roots to prevent anything else from growing nearby. Plants can recognize and protect their kin. Many plants will rearrange their leaves to avoid shading siblings. One of the points of the book is that we may have underestimated plants.

The book also discusses the possibility that plants may have a type of intelligence, perhaps even consciousness, depending on how you define it. This is a philosophical discussion. It should be noted that there was a very popular book in the 1970’s that made outlandish and pseudoscientific claims about plants. In the long run this book created a lot of skepticism towards claims within botany that seemed far-fetched despite collaborating evidence. The author laments this conservatism at the same time as she understands it.

There is a problem with getting unconventional work published in botany, at the same time the arduous peer-review process is an essential safeguard against false paths.

However, it has been established that plants do a lot of amazing things, and we are just beginning to realize the extent of plant behavior and communication. Some examples are, plants can communicate with each other even when they are too far apart to be passing information through their roots (perhaps pheromonal substances).

Plants produce electrical impulses and seem to have nodes at the tips of their roots that serve as local command centers. Plants can react to an attack of munching insects by summoning those insects’ specific predators to come and pick them up. They can perceive gravity, but we don’t know how. Primrose increases the sweetness of its nectar within three minutes if you play an audio recording of honeybee flight to it. Pea plants and many other plants grow their roots toward the sound of running water.

Other examples are, Tomatoes make thirty-five sounds per hour when drought stressed. Goldenrod can sense the volatile signals of nearby gall-forming flies and jump-start its immune system before the flies even make contact. Researchers who played tones at different frequencies to alfalfa sprouts for two hours saw that they increased the plants’ content of vitamin C. Plants can hear the caterpillars or pick up the vibrations they cause. Trichomes allow plants to sense the footsteps of moths and caterpillars.

Nasa poissoniana can store and recall information. It can remember the time intervals between bumble bee visits and anticipate the next time their pollinator was likely to arrive. Bittersweet nightshade recruit ants as bodyguards. Cornish mallow, a pink-flowered plant, will turn its leaves hours before sunrise to face the horizon in exactly the direction its expects the sun to rise. A common vine in this rainforest was capable of spontaneously morph into the shape of almost any plant it grew beside.

Plant mimicry is not that unusual. Scientists have long observed that virtually all plants are highly sensitive to touch of any kind and will change their growth accordingly. The book features several dozen more amazing examples of plant behavior, communication, sensing, and forms of memory including generational memory.

The book also delves into some other topics such as the importance of microbes for both plants and animals, including humans. Microbes influence our immune systems, our smells, and our attractiveness to mosquitos. Emerging research suggests that they may play a role in autism, depression, anxiety, and possible even who we are attracted to. The author also notes that pollution steadily filling the air appears to sabotage plants ability to send and interpret each other’s signals.

This is a book that is filled with interesting and perhaps even shocking information, and it certainly made me more interested in plants and botany. I think the book made the outlandish ideas about plant intelligence and conscience appear almost plausible. Plants are all around us and they are more interesting than I thought. The book is also well written and well organized. I should say that I did not think the first three chapters were very interesting, but it got better the further I read. I highly recommend this book.

The back cover features a picture of a plant on a black background and praise for the book. | The back cover of The Light Eaters: How the Unseen World of Plant Intelligence Offers a New Understanding of Life on Earth by Zoë Schlanger.
The back cover of The Light Eaters: How the Unseen World of Plant Intelligence Offers a New Understanding of Life on Earth by Zoë Schlanger. Click on the image to go to the Amazon page for the hardback version of the book.
To see the Super Facts click here

The Deadliest War in this Century was in Congo

Super fact 95 : More than 4-5 million people died in Congo Civil War 1998 to 2003 and its aftermath (until 2007). In addition, some of the other of the deadliest wars in the 21st century are not well known.

Below : 21st Century death toll from different wars, current and recent.

The graphics include colored circles corresponding to 15 wars. The conflicts are Second Congo Civil war 4 million deaths, Syrian Civil War 600 thousand deaths, Second Sudanese Civil War 450 thousand deaths, Russo-Ukrainian War 415 thousand deaths, War in Darfur 400 thousand deaths, South Sudanese Civil War 380 thousand deaths, Mexican drug war 375 thousand deaths, Yemeni civil war 370 thousand deaths, War in Afghanistan 360 thousand deaths, Boko Haram 350 thousand deaths, Iraqi war 285 thousand deaths, Colombia 225 thousand deaths, Chechen 150 thousand deaths, Angola 100 thousand deaths, Israel-Gaza War 75 thousand deaths, Israeli-Arab Total 80 thousand deaths.
The number of deaths cited in the graphics above correspond to rough midpoint values of the estimates for the 21st century. K stands for one thousand deaths. The area of the circles corresponds to these midpoint estimates. See the list of conflicts under “Deadliest twenty first Century Wars”.

Notes on the graphics above:

  • The 16 wars included in the graphics above roughly correspond to the deadliest wars in the 21st century. However, a few of the wars included in the graphics are not among the 16 deadliest wars of the 21st century.
  • Some of the wars included above started in the 20th century. The number of deaths estimates corresponds to the portions that happened in the 21st century.
  • The number of deaths from the Congo Civil War include famine and plagues that resulted from the war.
  • I had a hard time finding an estimate for just the 21st century portion of the Congo Civil War. However, the vast majority of the deaths happened in the 21st century.
  • The death estimates for the Russo-Ukrainian War might be underestimated due to unreliable reporting by Russian authorities.
  • The Israeli-Gaza war may seem smaller than expected. However, media attention does not necessarily correspond to the size of the devastation of a conflict.
  • The estimate for the number of deaths for the current Iran-US-Israel war is between 3,600 to nearly 5,400 deaths, which is too small to be part of this post.
  • There are / were hundreds of wars and conflicts in the 21st century.

I consider this a super fact because it is true, an important history fact and despite the enormous losses in the Congo Civil War a lot of people do not know much about it and may not even have heard about it.

The Deadliest War in this Century was in Congo
Photo by Safi Erneste on Pexels.com

Deadliest Wars in the Twenty First Century

  • The Second Congo Civil War 1998 to 2007. With an estimated 3 million to 5.4 million deaths. Read about it here, here, or here.
  • The Syrian civil war 2011 to 2024. With an estimated 580 thousand to 610 thousand deaths.
  • Second Sudanese Civil War 1983 to 2005. With an estimated 2 million deaths in total, with 300,000 to 600,000 deaths occurring in 21st century.
  • Tigray War 2020 to 2022. With an estimated 160 thousand to 600 thousand deaths.
  • War in Darfur 2003 to 2020. With an estimated 400 thousand deaths.
  • Russo-Ukrainian War 2014 to present. With an estimated 350 thousand to 480 thousand deaths.
  • Mexican drug war 2006 to present. With an estimated 350 thousand to 400 thousand deaths.
  • South Sudanese Civil War 2013 to 2020. With an estimated 380 thousand deaths.
  • Yemeni civil war 2014 to present. With an estimated 370 thousand deaths.
  • War in Afghanistan 2001–2021. With an estimated 360 thousand deaths.
  • Boko Haram insurgency 2009 to present. With an estimated 350 thousand deaths.
  • Iraqi war 2003 to 2017. With an estimated 270 thousand to 300 thousand deaths.
  • Colombian conflict 1964 to present. With an estimated 450 thousand deaths but with about half of those deaths happening in the intense fighting of the 21st century.
  • Chechen conflict 1994 to 2009. With an estimated 80 thousand to 230 thousand deaths, most  of those, 150 thousand, happening in the 21st century.
  • Angolan Civil War  1975 to 2002. With an estimated 800 thousand deaths many in the final years of the conflict with an estimated 100 thousand in the 21st century.
  • Burundian Civil War 1993 to 2005. With an estimated 550 thousand to 800 thousand deaths, many in the final years of the conflict with an estimated 50 thousand deaths in the 21st century.
  • The Arab Israeli conflict 1948 to present (multiple wars) . With an estimated 200 thousand deaths in total with 80 thousand deaths happening in the 21st century.
  • The Israel Gaza conflict (2023 to present). With an estimated 75 thousand deaths.

To read related posts of mine see “We are living in relatively peaceful times“ and “Deadliest Civil War Was the Taiping Rebellion”.

To see the other Super Facts click here

Human Vision Only Detects a Sliver of the EM Spectrum

Superfact 94: Light is electromagnetic radiation. The electromagnetic spectrum we deal with goes from long wave radiation at a frequency of 0.3 Giga Hertz to gamma rays at 30,000,000,000 Giga Hertz, and far beyond. Light that is visible to humans goes from around 428,000 Giga Hertz to 750,000 Giga Hertz. This is a very thin sliver in the electromagnetic spectrum. In addition, many animals can see beyond the spectrum visible to humans.

Esther’s writing prompt: April 8 : Vision

Click here or here  to join in.

If you consider wavelength instead of frequency, the electromagnetic spectrum goes from gamma rays at a wavelength of 0.00000000001 meters to long waves at a wavelength of 1,000 meters. Visible light has a wavelength of 0.0000004 meters to 0.0000007 meters. Again, human vision corresponds to only a thin sliver of the electromagnetic spectrum.

The picture shows the spectrum visible to humans as a horizontal bar at the top. This spectrum is superimposed on a wider spectrum below as a thin rainbow colored strip. The wider spectrum is also placed horizontally and goes from gamma rays to radio waves. | Human Vision Only Detects a Sliver of the EM Spectrum
The visible color spectrum. Sunlight wavelength and increasing frequency vector infographic illustration. Visible spectrum color range. Rainbow electromagnetic waves. Educational physics line. Shutterstock Asset id: 1933622132 by Shutterstock Asset id: 1933622132 WinWin artlab.
The electromagnetic spectrum is vertical and goes from long waves at the bottom to gamma rays at the top. The spectrum visible to humans is a thin sliver in the middle.
The spectrum visible to humans highlighted on a spectrum going from long waves to gamma rays. Original:  Penubag Vector:  Victor Blacus, CC BY-SA 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0&gt;, via Wikimedia Commons

It should be noted that the spectra above go from long waves to gamma rays because that’s the range of the spectra we typically deal with. However, the electromagnetic spectrum continues far beyond that.

I consider “Human Vision Only Detects a Sliver of the EM Spectrum” a super fact because it is a well-known fact among those who have studied physics, and it is an important fact, and yet I believe it is a surprise to many.

The Spectrum Visible to Animals

A lot of animals can see beyond the spectrum visible to humans. For example, animals that can see UV light including reindeer, scorpions, butterflies, bees, salmon, hedgehogs, many birds, amphibians, and reptiles. Humans cannot see UV light. You can read about various animals that can see UV light here, here, and here.

It appears that dogs and cats can see UV light as well. The color vision of dogs is in general poor, at least on the red side of the visible spectrum. However, dog vision includes UV light that we cannot see.

There are two colorful horizontal bars in the picture representing how the spectrum appears to people and dogs. The top bar depicts human’s view, and the bottom one is dog’s view. The human’s view is more colorful, but the dog’s view extends into UV light on the left.
Picture is from psychology today.

Many animals can also see or detect infrared radiation. A famous example are snakes. However, many other animals can detect infrared radiation including mosquitos, beetles, and other insects, some bats, bullfrogs, wolves, foxes, and some fish.

My Other Responses to Esther’s Prompts

To see the Other Super Facts click here